2018
DOI: 10.1112/jlms.12179
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Packing trees of unbounded degrees in random graphs

Abstract: In this paper, we address the problem of packing large trees in Gn,p. In particular, we prove the following result. Suppose that T1,…,TN are n‐vertex trees, each of which has maximum degree at most (np)1/6/(logn)6. Then with high probability, one can find edge‐disjoint copies of all the Ti in the random graph Gn,p, provided that p⩾(logn)36/n and N⩽(1−ε)np/2 for a positive constant ε. Moreover, if each Ti has at most (1−α)n vertices, for some positive α, then the same result holds under the much weaker assumpti… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
20
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
(78 reference statements)
2
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This implies an approximate version of the tree packing conjecture when the trees have maximum degree o(n/logn). The latter improves a bound of Ferber and Samotij which follows from their work on packing (spanning) trees in random graphs.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 52%
“…This implies an approximate version of the tree packing conjecture when the trees have maximum degree o(n/logn). The latter improves a bound of Ferber and Samotij which follows from their work on packing (spanning) trees in random graphs.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 52%
“…Generalising in the direction of removing the restriction to bounded degree graphs, Ferber and Samotij [11] showed two near-perfect packing results for trees, one for spanning trees of maximum degree O n 1/6 log −6 n , and one for almost spanning trees of maximum degree O n/ log n . The latter result also follows in the particular case of Ringel's Conjecture from the work of Adamaszek, Allen, Grosu, Hladký [1].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For k=2 there are few overlapps between the matchings and it requires a bit more careful treatment. For an example illustrating how to deal with it, the reader is referred to .…”
Section: Proof Of Theorem 14mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then, whp in Hkn,pk the number of edge‐disjoint perfect matchings, t , satisfies t=(1+o(1))true(kn1k1true)p.Remark We would like to give the following remarks: The case k=2 is a bit more complicated to handle using our technique, and in fact better tools are known for this case (generalizations of Hall's Theorem for finding “many” edge‐disjoint perfect matchings). For a non‐trivial example of applying the “online sprinkling” technique for graphs, the reader is referred to . Our p is optimal up to a polylog(n) factor as it can be easily seen that for p=o(logn/nk1), a typical Hkn,pk contains isolated vertices and therefore has no perfect matchings. Moreover, our value t is asymptotically optimal as well.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation