1999
DOI: 10.1021/ma990620o
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Packing Length Influence in Linear Polymer Melts on the Entanglement, Critical, and Reptation Molecular Weights

Abstract: We have shown in previous studies that the entanglement molecular weight for a polymer melt, M e, is related by a power law to p, the packing length of the polymer species. We now find that power laws also describe the molecular weights characterizing the melt viscosity, M c marking the onset of entanglement effects and M r the crossover to the reptation form. The packing length exponents for M e, M c, and M r differ significantly, however. The long-held notion that the ratio M c/M e has the same value for all… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

55
525
2

Year Published

2001
2001
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 427 publications
(582 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
55
525
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Constraint-release processes additionally reduce the viscosity sensitively and only the prefactor Q should then be rescaled appropiately to a smaller value than 15/4 ) 3.75. The reduction to 30% of its value as was suggested earlier by Fetters et al 7 to give ∼1.13 was physically wrong due to a confusing error in the used ref 4. Only the use of this particular wrong "Q" prefactor together with the fixed exponent 3.4 and fixed M c /M e leads to the erroneous prediction for M r .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Constraint-release processes additionally reduce the viscosity sensitively and only the prefactor Q should then be rescaled appropiately to a smaller value than 15/4 ) 3.75. The reduction to 30% of its value as was suggested earlier by Fetters et al 7 to give ∼1.13 was physically wrong due to a confusing error in the used ref 4. Only the use of this particular wrong "Q" prefactor together with the fixed exponent 3.4 and fixed M c /M e leads to the erroneous prediction for M r .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…where p* ) 9.2Å and T in absolute K. 7 Equation 11c is based on some assumptions which will be reevaluated here (strictly speaking, the packing length has been linked in a rigorous fashion only to M e ). At p* the entanglement and critical molecular weights become equal.…”
Section: Their Shear Relaxation Modulus G(t) Can Be Conveniently Exprmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Fetters and coworkers 13,22,23 The significance of this relationship is to imply that the topological constraint associated with chain entanglement is universal. Lin proposed that a certain one-to-one correspondence must exist between the size of a reptation tube, d t , and the number of entangled strands per unit volume, n v .…”
Section: Universality Of Entanglementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ϫ dy͓1 ϩ tanh͑2y/w͔͓͒1 ϩ tanh͑Ϫ2y/w͔͒ (23) which is equal to 0.5. The effect of is to decrease the entanglement density within the interface by that factor.…”
Section: Interfacial Entanglementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The value of M 0 was given above as M 0 = 68.114. For the polymer density we use the value given by Abdel-Goad, et al, [1], as ρ = 0.90 × 10 −24 g/Å 3 at T = 298 K (values range from 0.9 × 10 −24 to 1 × 10 −24 g/Å 3 , [14], [16], [17], [18], but most commonly 0.9 × 10 −24 g/Å 3 ). The segment density is then…”
Section: Results For Polyisoprenementioning
confidence: 99%