2009
DOI: 10.17487/rfc5481
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Packet Delay Variation Applicability Statement

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The conventional range (maximum-minimum) should be avoided for several reasons, including stability of the maximum delay due to the influence by outliers. RFC 5481 [RFC5481], Section 6.5 highlights how the 99.9th percentile of delay and delay variation is more helpful to performance planners. To overcome this drawback, the idea is to couple the mean delay measure for the entire batch with a Double-Marking Method, where a subset of batch packets is selected for extensive delay calculation by using a second marking.…”
Section: Double-marking Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The conventional range (maximum-minimum) should be avoided for several reasons, including stability of the maximum delay due to the influence by outliers. RFC 5481 [RFC5481], Section 6.5 highlights how the 99.9th percentile of delay and delay variation is more helpful to performance planners. To overcome this drawback, the idea is to couple the mean delay measure for the entire batch with a Double-Marking Method, where a subset of batch packets is selected for extensive delay calculation by using a second marking.…”
Section: Double-marking Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This means that the latency test described in [RFC2544] is replaced by measurement of a metric derived from IPPM's [RFC7679], where a set of statistical summaries will be provided (mean, max, min, and percentiles). Further metrics planned to be benchmarked include packet delay variation as defined by [RFC5481], reordering, burst behaviour, DUT availability, DUT Tahhan capacity, and packet loss in long-term testing at the throughput level, where some low level of background loss may be present and characterized.…”
Section: +--------------------------------------------------+mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inter-Packet Delay Variation (IPDV) and Packet Delay Variation (PDV) [RFC5481] are performance metrics derived from one-way delay measurement and are important in some applications. IPDV represents the difference between the one-way delays of successive packets in a stream.…”
Section: Delay Variation Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%