The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 9:30 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 1 hour.
2011 Sixth International Conference on Image and Graphics 2011
DOI: 10.1109/icig.2011.148
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Packed Dense Interest Points for Scene Image Retrieval

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In Table 1, we have reported the precision of our embedded method against the precisions achieved by the approaches using only similarity function score [12] or only the Hausdorff distance [17]. We can observe that our method precision outperforms the state-of-art ones.…”
Section: Results Evaluation and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 67%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In Table 1, we have reported the precision of our embedded method against the precisions achieved by the approaches using only similarity function score [12] or only the Hausdorff distance [17]. We can observe that our method precision outperforms the state-of-art ones.…”
Section: Results Evaluation and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…The latter ones could be based on Harris interest points [6], or are distribution-based descriptors such as scale invariant feature transform (SIFT) descriptors [7], shape contexts [8], or the speed-up robust features (SURF) [9] and more recently, DAISY [10]. The local descriptors could also be computed on a dense grid as it is the case for the histogram of oriented gradient (HOG) [11] or the packed dense interest points [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…These local distribution-based descriptors are computed in surrounding regions of extracted keypoints by means of interest point detectors such as Hessian detector [17], Harris [18], Laplacian of Gaussian (LoG) [19], Difference of Gaussian (DoG) [12], etc. or by dense sampling such as in [20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%