1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0021-9673(98)00300-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Packed-column supercritical fluid chromatography coupled with solid-phase extraction for the determination of organic microcontaminants in water

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Overall, recoveries were somewhat lower than are observed for regulatory methods such as U.S. EPA method 550.1 [29], but were considered acceptable for screening purposes. The low molecular weight compounds (NAPH, ACY, ACE, FLU, and PHEN) had comparable or better recoveries than methods involving preconditioning and cleaning steps [25,41]. Because the low molecular weight compounds are more likely to leach from coal deposits, this selectivity was considered desirable for the analytical objectives of the present study.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Overall, recoveries were somewhat lower than are observed for regulatory methods such as U.S. EPA method 550.1 [29], but were considered acceptable for screening purposes. The low molecular weight compounds (NAPH, ACY, ACE, FLU, and PHEN) had comparable or better recoveries than methods involving preconditioning and cleaning steps [25,41]. Because the low molecular weight compounds are more likely to leach from coal deposits, this selectivity was considered desirable for the analytical objectives of the present study.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…VOICE (20%). Toribio et al [25] also reported low recoveries for two of these compounds (BaA and CHRY) and speculated that this was due to incomplete elution from the cartridges. Overall, recoveries were somewhat lower than are observed for regulatory methods such as U.S. EPA method 550.1 [29], but were considered acceptable for screening purposes.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In recent literature, various methods for determining napropamide have been proposed such as high‐performance liquid chromatography,11–15 fluorescence16–19 and micelle‐stabilized RTP 20. All of these methods are laborious and time‐consuming for use in routine environmental control laboratories; the most rapid methodology takes at least 10 min for determining napropamide.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%