2021
DOI: 10.1111/jiec.13189
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Packaging environmental impact on seafood supply chains: A review of life cycle assessment studies

Abstract: Packaging is fundamental for food preservation and transportation, but generates an environmental burden from its production and end-of-life management. This review evaluates packaging contribution to the environmental performance of seafood products. Life cycle assessment (LCA) studies were evaluated by both qualitative and quantitative analysis. The qualitative analysis assessed how direct (e.g. packaging material) and indirect impacts (e.g. influence on seafood loss and waste) have been considered, while th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 86 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A recent review on the packaging's contribution to the environmental performance of seafood products has been presented by Almeida et al. (2021), involving 32 peer‐reviewed articles. Among those articles, the majority suggested substituting tin plate or aluminum by other packaging nonmetal materials such as plastic or glass for canned products.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent review on the packaging's contribution to the environmental performance of seafood products has been presented by Almeida et al. (2021), involving 32 peer‐reviewed articles. Among those articles, the majority suggested substituting tin plate or aluminum by other packaging nonmetal materials such as plastic or glass for canned products.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, cans of tinned seafood suppose an important contribution to the climate change potential of the product [49,[64][65][66]. On average, packaging of canned seafood made of tinplate, aluminium or glass contributes 42% of the product's climate change impact and 27% of the product's weight, indicating that for such products, packaging production is commonly a major bottleneck [67]. This demonstrates that the type of packaging material could have a significant influence on the product's environmental performance.…”
Section: Packaging Eco-design and Waste Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This demonstrates that the type of packaging material could have a significant influence on the product's environmental performance. Unlike certain materials, plastic has a low contribution to seafood products' climate change impact, mainly due to its lower energy requirements in the production phase compared to other materials (e.g., aluminium) [67]. As an example, plastic packaging can be the most environmentally friendly option for the distribution of fruit and vegetables compared to reusable plastic crates with single-use cardboard boxes [68].…”
Section: Packaging Eco-design and Waste Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A study by Almeida et al (2022) provides an in-depth review of the impact of packaging materials in the overall impact of seafood products.…”
Section: Fishing and Aquaculturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…A study by Almeida et al. (2022) provides an in‐depth review of the impact of packaging materials in the overall impact of seafood products. Focused mainly on GHG emissions, the study highlights how paper‐ and plastic‐based packaging materials tend to show substantially lower carbon footprint values than glass‐, aluminum‐, or tin‐based packages.…”
Section: Fishing and Aquaculturementioning
confidence: 99%