2006
DOI: 10.1109/tap.2006.879191
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Package-Level Integrated Antennas Based on LTCC Technology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
37
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 95 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A better gain of 9.5 dBi is achieved compared to the design reported in [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15]. Figure 1 depicts the geometry of the LEE-H patch antenna.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A better gain of 9.5 dBi is achieved compared to the design reported in [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15]. Figure 1 depicts the geometry of the LEE-H patch antenna.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…This poses a design challenge for the microstrip antenna designer to meet the broadband techniques [2,3]. There are numerous and well-known methods to increase the bandwidth of antennas, including increase of the substrate thickness, the use of a low dielectric substrate, the use of various impedance matching and feeding techniques, the use of multiple resonator, and the use of slot antenna geometry [4][5][6]. However, the bandwidth and the size of an antenna are generally mutually conflicting properties, that is, improvement of one of the characteristics normally results in degradation of the other.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9]. Moreover, some structures are etched in the patch or ground plane to miniaturize the size of antenna [10][11][12][13][14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This poses a design challenge for the microstrip antenna designer to meet the broadband techniques [2,3]. There are numerous and well-known methods to increase the bandwidth of antennas, including increase of the substrate thickness, the use of a low dielectric substrate, the use of various impedance matching and feeding techniques, the use of multiple resonators, and the use of slot antenna geometry [4,5]. However, the bandwidth and the size of an antenna are generally mutually conflicting properties, that is, improvement of one of the characteristics normally results in degradation of the other.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it was pointed out [6] that using a higher patch height could cause a higher cross-polarization level. And, the antenna gain drops to 5 dBi, which is lower than other wide-band patch antennas [4,5]. Some other techniques as utilizing the shorting pins or shorting walls on the unequal arms of a U-shaped patch, U-slot patch, or L-probe feed patch antennas, wideband and dual-band impedance bandwidth have been achieved with electrically small size in [7,8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%