Pacific Youth: Local and Global Futures 2019
DOI: 10.22459/py.2019.01
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pacific Youth, Local and Global

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Pacific diaspora is increasingly well understood, but what is new here is the extent to which this understanding is also well understood by children and so clearly articulated by them. We hope the sharing of evidence from children in this study can lead to more in-depth insights on younger Pacific children's hitherto largely ignored perspectives, complementing the work already done with older Pacific youth (Lee 2019).…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The Pacific diaspora is increasingly well understood, but what is new here is the extent to which this understanding is also well understood by children and so clearly articulated by them. We hope the sharing of evidence from children in this study can lead to more in-depth insights on younger Pacific children's hitherto largely ignored perspectives, complementing the work already done with older Pacific youth (Lee 2019).…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Auckland has a Pacific Island population of 194,000 including 118,403 Samoans and 62,403 Tongans (Auckland Council, 2019). Many diasporic young people are also negotiating multi-ethnic identities (Lee and Craney, 2019).…”
Section: The Pacific Island Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Oceania, these terms are socially defined and enacted; they do not adhere to fixed parameters such as age, although policy documents label youth as being 'between 15 and 34 years of age' in Solomon Islands (Government of Solomon Islands, 2017: 14) and 'between the ages of 15 and 35' in Fiji (Government of Fiji, 2012: 3). As Lee and Craney (2019: 2) articulate, youthhood is most accurately determined by cultural values that 'often mean that youth are understood to be those who are not yet married with children or in positions of authority. Simply being of a certain age or occupying "adult" roles, such as being in paid employment, is not always enough to be considered fully adult'.…”
Section: Framing and Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The family and proximity of extended family in most Pacific Island children's lives, school and local community spaces provide this secure base. To reiterate as Lee and Craney (2019) state, Pacific Island life revolves around the 'home, school and the church' (temple/mosque for Indo-Fijian children). The centrality of these three features was well evidenced across the children's maps.…”
Section: Conclusion: Mapping Children's Life Worldsmentioning
confidence: 99%