“…Several different models have been proposed to explain the tectonic development of the belt: (1) ʻmiogeosyncline basinʼ; Devonian -Carboniferous thick turbidite basin probably deposited on ʻhiddenʼ Archean -Neoproterozoic basement (Kovalenko et al, 1996;Badarch et al, 2002, and references therein); (2) oceanic turbidite terrane (Tomurtogoo, 2002); and (3) accretionary complex (Şengör et al, 1993;Şengör and Natal'in, 1996;Teraoka et al, 1996;Kurimoto et al, 1997;Zorin, 1999;Dorjsuren et al, 2006;Kurihara et al, 2006Kurihara et al, , 2009Tomurotgoo, 2006Tomurotgoo, , 2012Tsukada et al, 2006Tsukada et al, , 2013Byamba et al, 2009;Safonova et al, 2009, Safonova andSantosh, 2012). Presently, the latter hypothesis is widely accepted and evidenced by recent comprehensive sedimentological, biostratigraphical, and geochemical studies conducted on rocks of oceanic plate stratigraphy, which occur as thrust slices (Tomurtogoo, 2002(Tomurtogoo, , 2006(Tomurtogoo, , 2012Kurihara et al, 2006Kelty et al, 2008;Safonova et al, 2009;Bussien et al, 2011;Roser, 2012, 2013), and the hypothesis is partly demonstrated in the new tectonostratigraphic subdivision map of Mongolia (Tomurtogoo, 2006(Tomurtogoo, , 2012. The opening time of the Hangay -Hentey paleo -ocean has been variably interpreted in the literature: Vendian (Şengör et al, 1993;Şengör and Natal'in, 1996;Tomurtogoo et al, 2005;Maruyama et al, 2007;Xiao et al, 2008), Silurian (Zorin, 1999;…”