2019
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-019-12337-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pacific subduction control on Asian continental deformation including Tibetan extension and eastward extrusion tectonics

Abstract: The India-Asia collision has formed the highest mountains on Earth and is thought to account for extensive intraplate deformation in Asia. The prevailing explanation considers the role of the Pacific and Sunda subduction zones as passive during deformation. Here we test the hypothesis that subduction played an active role and present geodynamic experiments of continental deformation that model Indian indentation and active subduction rollback. We show that the synchronous activity and interaction of the collis… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
89
1
5

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(104 citation statements)
references
References 80 publications
3
89
1
5
Order By: Relevance
“…At the earlier stage of Neo‐Tethys subduction northward under the continental Eurasian plate between ~70 and 45 Ma, the subducting plate moved very fast, with a speed ranging between 10 and 20 cm/year (White & Lister, 2012). In addition, tectonic reconstructions show that the India‐Eurasia collision boundary has moved northward (Replumaz et al, 2004; Replumaz & Tapponnier, 2003; Schellart et al, 2019), which indicates trench advance and implies slab rollover. Particularly, recent work (Schellart et al, 2019) estimated that the India‐Eurasia collision zone has migrated approximately northward some 1,700 km over the last 50–55 Myr, with an average “trench” advance rate of about 3.2–3.5 cm/year.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the earlier stage of Neo‐Tethys subduction northward under the continental Eurasian plate between ~70 and 45 Ma, the subducting plate moved very fast, with a speed ranging between 10 and 20 cm/year (White & Lister, 2012). In addition, tectonic reconstructions show that the India‐Eurasia collision boundary has moved northward (Replumaz et al, 2004; Replumaz & Tapponnier, 2003; Schellart et al, 2019), which indicates trench advance and implies slab rollover. Particularly, recent work (Schellart et al, 2019) estimated that the India‐Eurasia collision zone has migrated approximately northward some 1,700 km over the last 50–55 Myr, with an average “trench” advance rate of about 3.2–3.5 cm/year.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The role of pull from the southeast Asian oceanic slab to the whole Indian continent-Indian Ocean plate is invoked to drive the indentation motions of the Indian plate in the Cenozoic, as the slab pull force must have vanished here (Capitanio & Replumaz, 2013;Guillot et al, 2003). This is supported by stress field continuity throughout the Asian plate (Hieronymus et al, 2010;Schellart et al, 2019;Warners-Ruckstuhl et al, 2012) and mantle flow (Jolivet et al, 2018;Sternai et al, 2016) from Tibet toward the southeast Asia.…”
Section: Modeling the Force Balance Of Continental Tectonicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although here the "balanced topography assumption" (Warners-Ruckstuhl et al, 2012) is followed, implying that the topographic load is balance to the first order (plate-scale) by stress due to plate boundary forces (Lyon-Caen & Molnar, 1985). The role of crustal flow (Clark & Royden, 2000;England & McKenzie, 1982) and gravitational spreading has been addressed by several works focusing on a reduced Asian area (Bischoff & Flesch, 2018;Clark, 2012;Clark & Royden, 2000;Copley et al, 2010) (Schellart et al, 2019).…”
Section: Constraining the Forces Driving Asian Tectonicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Recently, Boutelier et al [2019]) described PIV-derived finite deformation by U. Contrastingly, the infinitesimal strain tensor (equation 15) that has often been used to describe relatively large deformations (e.g. [Adam et al, 2013, Hoth et al, 2007, Sun et al, 2018, Poppe et al, 2019, Schellart et al, 2019), describes shape changes properly only for small shears and small rotations. Especially, quantities such as principal strains, area change, and rotation from the infinitesimal strain tensor no longer hold for large shear (section 2.5.4).…”
Section: Correct Strain Tensors For Large Deformationmentioning
confidence: 99%