2010
DOI: 10.1161/circulationaha.110.970483
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pacemaker Reuse

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
26
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
26
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Battery depletion is an obvious disadvantage for resterilized devices, as we mentioned above, and a reason not to reuse pacemakers because there might be associated risks in future pacemaker generator changes. 19 Interestingly, even when the average duration for all reused devices was lower than that for new devices, it was only 2½ years less (6.17±1.67 years [4-year minimum estimate] versus 8.9±0.68 years in control subjects), so, the average duration for the resterilized pacemakers was actually longer than expected. Resterilized devices do have a shorter battery life, as should be expected, and there is a tendency to have higher rates of unexpected battery depletion than in new pacemakers.…”
Section: )mentioning
confidence: 87%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Battery depletion is an obvious disadvantage for resterilized devices, as we mentioned above, and a reason not to reuse pacemakers because there might be associated risks in future pacemaker generator changes. 19 Interestingly, even when the average duration for all reused devices was lower than that for new devices, it was only 2½ years less (6.17±1.67 years [4-year minimum estimate] versus 8.9±0.68 years in control subjects), so, the average duration for the resterilized pacemakers was actually longer than expected. Resterilized devices do have a shorter battery life, as should be expected, and there is a tendency to have higher rates of unexpected battery depletion than in new pacemakers.…”
Section: )mentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Once again, safety issues have been addressed. 18 Baman et al 19 published a meta-analysis of all the different studies published on this topic and found no difference in major events for reused pacemakers. Some limitations related to all meta-analyses, and correctly addressed by the author, should be taken into consideration.…”
Section: )mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Thus, a large number of potentially reusable pacemakers would be available for reuse. All deceased individuals undergoing cremation must have their devices removed, and as many as 5% of individuals choose to have their device removed before burial [7]. Importantly, patients and their families are willing to participate in pacemaker donation.…”
Section: Availability Of Post-mortem Pacemakersmentioning
confidence: 99%