1974
DOI: 10.1016/0002-9149(74)90293-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pacemaker-induced cardiovascular failure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1976
1976
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Unfortunately it is difficult to predict who might suffer from the syndrome prior to pacemaker implantation. The syndrome can arise in patients of either sex and of any age, with normal or impaired ventricular function, with or without retrograde V‐A conduction, and at any time after VVI pacemaker insertion 27 …”
Section: Which Pacing Mode?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately it is difficult to predict who might suffer from the syndrome prior to pacemaker implantation. The syndrome can arise in patients of either sex and of any age, with normal or impaired ventricular function, with or without retrograde V‐A conduction, and at any time after VVI pacemaker insertion 27 …”
Section: Which Pacing Mode?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…RV pacing results in reduced stroke volume by the loss of the atrial contribution and by mitral and tricuspid insufficiency (8)(9)(10). When the cardiac reserve is adequate, RV pacing may be well tolerated, but it can be catastrophic (11) or bizarre (12) but more commonly worsens the neurological status of the patient, especially vertebral basilar symptoms (13). When this occurs, physiologic pacing may resolve the problem.…”
Section: Pacemaker Aggravation Of Neurological Symptomsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mode of pacing most widely used for this pur pose has been ventricular (VVI) [4], VVI pacemakers are usually programmable in terms of fixed heart rate, but Dual-chamber pacemakers were introduced to enable the atrial contraction, whether it is spontaneous or paced, to be followed by ventricular contraction after a programmed atrioventricular delay period [4][5][6][7][8][9]. How ever, these complex devices add substantial cost and the documentation of the benefit of this methodology in the broad spectrum of patients receiving permanent pace makers is scant.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%