1992
DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.1992.sp019276
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pacemaker current in single cells and in aggregates of cells dissociated from the embryonic chick heart.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
13
0
1

Year Published

1994
1994
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
13
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The current was observed in cultures from seven day embryonic ventricles, but markedly reduced in those obtained from 17 day embryos. A 1992 report from these authors [1] confirmed that the current was indeed i f . The conclusion was that i f was indeed present in young embryonic ventricle, but expression was lost during development.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The current was observed in cultures from seven day embryonic ventricles, but markedly reduced in those obtained from 17 day embryos. A 1992 report from these authors [1] confirmed that the current was indeed i f . The conclusion was that i f was indeed present in young embryonic ventricle, but expression was lost during development.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Until recently, however, there was agreement that i f was present in all regions of the heart that show spontaneous activity, including the sinus node, latent atrial pacemakers, and Purkinje fibers, but absent from ventricular tissue. Recent reports have questioned this fundamental premise concerning the absence of i f in the normally quiescent ventricle [1,7]. The first evidence for i f in the ventricle actually dates to 1980, when Shrier and Clay [5] reported a current with strikingly similar voltage and time dependence to i f in embryonic chick ventricle.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the basis of the conductance, reversal potential, kinetics, and activation curve described in Ref. 5, we find that addition of I f to the model causes only a very slight decrease in IBI from 392 to 390 ms. The MDP in our cells is, hence, too depolarized for I f to activate and contribute significantly to pacemaking activity; therefore, we do not include it in our model.…”
Section: Currents Not Included In the Ionic Modelmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The pacemaker current (I f) has been reported in ventricular reaggregates (4,14,15,87,88) as well as in single atrial and ventricular cells and small clusters of such cells (4,5,85). The midpoint of the activation range of I f is ϳ30 mV more negative in single ventricular cells and small clusters than in reaggregates, with the foot of the activation curve of this hyperpolarization-activated current lying at Ϫ70 mV in single cells and small clusters (5). In our clusters, we find I f activated at potentials negative to Ϫ70 mV (79).…”
Section: Currents Not Included In the Ionic Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of course, this does not necessarily exclude the possibility that other currents such as if current also may contribute to the pacemaker depolarizations in the ventricular cells of young embryos. However, the if current in this tissue likely flows in a more negative potential range (Vm <-60 mV) (7,13).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%