2009
DOI: 10.1016/s0049-3848(09)70117-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

P72 Catastrophic antiphospholipid syndrome, genetic and acquired thrombophilia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the structure of early reproductive losses, one of the main places is occupied by nondeveloping pregnancy (NP), the frequency of which remains stably high [1][2][3][4]. At the same time, despite numerous studies on this issue, the proportion of unexplained causes of NP still remains high and, according to different authors, ranges from 25 to 57% [5][6][7][8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In the structure of early reproductive losses, one of the main places is occupied by nondeveloping pregnancy (NP), the frequency of which remains stably high [1][2][3][4]. At the same time, despite numerous studies on this issue, the proportion of unexplained causes of NP still remains high and, according to different authors, ranges from 25 to 57% [5][6][7][8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most researchers believe that a persistent viral bacterial infection occupies the leading place in the etiology of NP, and chronic endometritis forms the basis of the pathogenesis of this pathology [6,7,[10][11][12]. So, according to VE Radzinsky [7], genital infection was detected in 96% of women with NP.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…indicators of the level of specificity and sensitivity of the del / + polymorphism of the GSTT1 gene were SE = 0.8 and SP = 0.75, respectively, at significantly high values (OR = 11.7; 95% CI 5.132-26.9). At the same time, the calculated AUC indicator demonstrates a high level of effectiveness for predicting the development of the disease, which indicates the possible independent effect of this polymorphism on the risk of pathology development[22][23][24][25][26][27][28]. The SE and SP indices of the combined variant of the del polymorphisms of the GSTM1 + GSTT1 genes deviate towards sensitivity and are equal to 0.86 and 0.43, respectively and the efficiency rating is 0.65.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%