2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2022.09.069
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

P57 Machine Learning-Accelerated Outcomes Research: A Real-World Case Study of Biomarker-Associated Overall Survival in Oncology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Detailed performance metrics are out of scope for this paper. Beyond satisfactory ML metrics, we found that in some cases ML-extraction can achieve similar error rates as manual abstraction by clinical experts ( Waskom et al, 2023 ), and replication studies suggest that research analysis relying on multiple variables can reach similar results and conclusions when using variables curated by ML-extraction compared with human experts ( Benedum et al, 2022 ; Sondhi et al, 2022 ; Benedum et al, 2023 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 70%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Detailed performance metrics are out of scope for this paper. Beyond satisfactory ML metrics, we found that in some cases ML-extraction can achieve similar error rates as manual abstraction by clinical experts ( Waskom et al, 2023 ), and replication studies suggest that research analysis relying on multiple variables can reach similar results and conclusions when using variables curated by ML-extraction compared with human experts ( Benedum et al, 2022 ; Sondhi et al, 2022 ; Benedum et al, 2023 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…Using a performance evaluation framework ( Devlin et al, 2018 ) for variables curated using the approach of ML extraction we affirmed high quality and fitness-for-use in RWE generation. We have shown that validations using the combination of multiple ML-extracted variables in one RWD analysis demonstrated no meaningful difference in RWE findings based on replications with the Flatiron Health variables curated by ML extraction compared with expert human abstraction ( Forsyth et al, 2018 ; Zeng et al, 2018 ; Jorge et al, 2019 ; Karimi et al, 2021 ; Maarseveen et al, 2021 ; Benedum et al, 2022 ; Sondhi et al, 2022 ; Yang et al, 2022 ; Benedum et al, 2023 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Beyond satisfactory ML metrics, we found that in some cases ML-extraction can achieve similar error rates as manual abstraction by clinical experts (Waskom et al, in press, 2023), and replication studies suggest that research analysis relying on multiple variables can reach similar results and conclusions when using variables curated by ML-extraction compared with human experts (Benedum et al, in press, 2023). 35 36…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have shown that validations using the combination of multiple ML-extracted variables in one RWD analysis demonstrated no meaningful difference in RWE findings based on replications with the Flatiron Health variables curated by ML extraction compared with expert human abstraction (Benedum et al, in press, 2023). 36 35…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%