P559 Efficacy of Ustekinumab in the treatment of patients with Crohn’s disease with failure to previous conventional or biologic therapy: an observational real-life study

Abstract

Background Ustekinumab (UST), a human anti-IL12/23p40 monoclonal antibody, was approved by FDA and EMA for the treatment of moderate to severe Crohn’s disease (CD). Whether UST is effective in inducing deep remission, including mucosal healing and transmural healing, in patients with CD in a real life setting is not completely clear. Methods The study was performed on 92 subjects (47 males; 45 females; mean age: 42 (17–78) from six medical centers in Campania, Italy, with confirmed diagnosis of moderate to severe Crohn’s disease and no neoplasia. In all patients diagnosis of CD had been reached to years earlier. Before inclusion, all patients had been exposed and had failed to respond to conventional and/or at least one biological therapy.The administration of UST was as follows: IV infusion at week 0 (3 vials of 130 mg each if body weight of 55–85 kg; 2 vials of130 mg each if body weight < 55 kg) and subsequent SC injections (90 mg) q8w thereafter. At enrollment, all subjects underwent colonoscopy and were divided into groups according to endoscopic evaluation: 5 (5.4%) patients had erosions; 24 (26.1%) inflammation; 63 (68.5%) ulcers. Based on the CDAI value, 52 (56.5%) patients had a CDAI of 180–220, 35 (38%) had a CDAI of 220–450, and 5 (5.4%) had a CDAI >450. All patients underwent endoscopic examination and bowel MRI or ultrasonography at baseline and at week 52 to evaluate mucosal and transmural healing. Clinical response was defined as a reduction of CDAI by at least 100 points; clinical remission when CDAI was lower than 150. Clinical response and remission were evaluated at baseline and on 5 different occasions throughout a 12 months follow-up. Incidence of treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) was recorded during the study period. Results Seventeen patients interrupted therapy while 75 patients continued follow-up until the fifth visit. Clinical response at week 52 was achieved in 38 (50,5%) patients and clinical remission in 29 (39%). Twenty-six (34%) patients showed mucosal healing, 34 (45%) showed partial endoscopic response. Fifteen patients (20%) did not show any change during endoscopic evaluation at follow-up. All patients showing mucosal healing also showed transmural healing, as assessed by ultrasonography or MRI. No major TRAEs were observed during treatment. Conclusion In this multi-center, real life study, we show that UST was well tolerated and effective in inducing clinical response and clinical remission in patients with moderate to severe CD who had previously failed to respond to conventional or biologic therapy. UST showed limited efficacy in inducing deep remission (i.e. mucosal+transmural healing).

Real-World Evidence of the Effectiveness and Safety of Ustekinumab for the Treatment of Crohn’s Disease: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies

“…A total of 63 studies (including 8529 patients) met the inclusion criteria and were finally included in the systematic review and meta-analysis ( Figure 1 ) [ 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 , 58 , 59 , 60 , 61 , 62 , 63 , 64 , 65 , 66 , 67 , 68 , 69 , ...…”

Ustekinumab Is Associated with Real-World Long-Term Effectiveness and Improved Health-Related Quality of Life in Crohn's Disease

“…Endoscopic remission is an important endpoint in clinical studies of the effectiveness of biologics. An Italian real-world study of ustekinumab in patients with CD reported clinical response and remission rates after 52 weeks of 51% and 35%, respectively [ 30 ]. However, the endoscopic response (45%) and mucosal healing (35%) rates were lower.…”

Ustekinumab in the Treatment of Inflammatory Bowel Diseases: Evolving Paradigms

“…In most real-life studies, UST was used on anti-TNF-α failure or refractory patients [ 70 , 71 ]. In this specific clinical context, remission at 24 weeks and (when available) at 52 weeks ranged from 31% to 75% and 25% to 60%, respectively [ 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 ]. Moreover, mucosal healing (MH) and fecal calprotectin (FC) levels significantly improved under UST treatment [ 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , …”

“…Long-term data from the CERTIFI and UNITI-IM for CD, and UNIFI for UC, have proven the efficacy of UST for the induction and maintenance of remission in both IBDs, and the most favorable results were observed in naïve patients to biological drugs [ 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 ]. Numerous “real world” (RW) data that have emerged in recent years have confirmed the favorable clinical, endoscopic, and histological results in patients treated with UST, the safety of which has thus been strengthened [ 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 , 58 , 59 ]. The results of the first comparative study between UST and an anti-TNF-α have further supported this claim [ 60 ].…”