1995
DOI: 10.1097/00000372-199510000-00005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

p53 Protein and Proliferating Cell Nuclear Antigen in Eccrine Poroma and Porocarcinoma An Immunohistochemical Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our study further benefits from correlation with mutation status of the relevant genes in a subset of cases. Some previous reports have not found a significant difference between poromas and porocarcinomas in the percentage of cells labeling for p53 [9][10][11][12][13] ; however, many of these studies did not account for staining intensity. In our cohort, a high percentage of cells in poromas showed weak p53 staining; evaluation of p53 staining intensity was therefore critical for distinguishing mutation-associated p53 overexpression in porocarcinoma from diffuse but predominantly weak expression in poromas.…”
Section: Rb P53 and P16 Immunohistochemistry Performance As A Diamentioning
confidence: 85%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Our study further benefits from correlation with mutation status of the relevant genes in a subset of cases. Some previous reports have not found a significant difference between poromas and porocarcinomas in the percentage of cells labeling for p53 [9][10][11][12][13] ; however, many of these studies did not account for staining intensity. In our cohort, a high percentage of cells in poromas showed weak p53 staining; evaluation of p53 staining intensity was therefore critical for distinguishing mutation-associated p53 overexpression in porocarcinoma from diffuse but predominantly weak expression in poromas.…”
Section: Rb P53 and P16 Immunohistochemistry Performance As A Diamentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Previous studies have examined p53, Rb, or p16 staining in the context of poromas and/or porocarcinomas, although to our knowledge our study is the first to rigorously examine the combined performance of all three markers. Our study further benefits from correlation with mutation status of the relevant genes in a subset of cases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Limited prior studies have focused on the status of selected tumor suppressor genes, including p53, the adenomatous polyposis coli gene, p16, and the retinoblastoma gene. [14][15][16][17] However, these studies do not identify any defining genetic aberration. Thus a more broad-based molecular approach may be necessary to fully elucidate specific gene defects involved in eccrine poroma tumorigenesis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Tateyama et al reported that proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) positive cells in eccrine porocarcinomas were significantly higher than those in poromas (9). They have also described that the PCNA index is useful in differentiating between poroma and porocarcinoma.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%