2006
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2559.2005.02321.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

p53 immunostaining in lichen sclerosus is related to ischaemic stress and is not a marker of differentiated vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia (d‐VIN)

Abstract: d-VIN in LS is rare, while p53 staining is common and best explained as an ischaemic stress response due to poor oxygenation, vasculitis and inflammation rather than as a marker of a precancerous lesion in LS.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

3
48
2
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 89 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
3
48
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…7,11,12,19,20 The immunohistochemistry signal observed in lichen simplex chronicus and lichen sclerosus is usually weak and confined to a single, un-expanded layer of basal Tp53 mutations in differentiated vulvar intraepithelial neoplasias cells. 12,21 In these entities, Tp53 mutations are usually not found; therefore, the p53 protein signal has been attributed to upregulation of p53 wild-type protein, possibly reflecting a stress response to inflammation or ischemia. 21 In contrast, p53 immunohistochemistry signals in differentiated vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia have been described as strong and constant, and often involving more than a single layer of basal-type cells, as observed in the majority (4/5) of our cases (Figures 1b, 2a-c).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…7,11,12,19,20 The immunohistochemistry signal observed in lichen simplex chronicus and lichen sclerosus is usually weak and confined to a single, un-expanded layer of basal Tp53 mutations in differentiated vulvar intraepithelial neoplasias cells. 12,21 In these entities, Tp53 mutations are usually not found; therefore, the p53 protein signal has been attributed to upregulation of p53 wild-type protein, possibly reflecting a stress response to inflammation or ischemia. 21 In contrast, p53 immunohistochemistry signals in differentiated vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia have been described as strong and constant, and often involving more than a single layer of basal-type cells, as observed in the majority (4/5) of our cases (Figures 1b, 2a-c).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…12,21 In these entities, Tp53 mutations are usually not found; therefore, the p53 protein signal has been attributed to upregulation of p53 wild-type protein, possibly reflecting a stress response to inflammation or ischemia. 21 In contrast, p53 immunohistochemistry signals in differentiated vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia have been described as strong and constant, and often involving more than a single layer of basal-type cells, as observed in the majority (4/5) of our cases (Figures 1b, 2a-c). 12,22,23 The immunohistochemistry signal observed in this context has been presumed to derive from an abnormal (mutated) p53 protein.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…P53 immunoexpression, however, is neither sensitive nor specific marker of differentiated VIN, 56 neither it correlates with the actual p53 gene mutation in benign or malignant vulvar squamous epithelium. 57,58 These two problems with p53 immunostaining have been widely illustrated by numerous previous publications 11,15,19,20,[56][57][58] and in the authors own experience p53 immunostain is not useful in differential diagnosis of HPV-negative vulvar lesions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8,12 In addition, despite the fact that differentiated VIN was first described in the 1960s by Abell 23 as a highly differentiated form of vulvar carcinoma in situ, until more recently, the entity has not gained wide attention because its existence as a clinicopathological entity has long been questioned. 18 As more insight is gained that vulvar squamous cell carcinomas originate from two different pathways, each with its own premalignant lesions, 24,25 differentiated VIN has been designated the direct precursor of the HPV-independent pathway. Earlier, all VIN lesions were classified as being HPV related, which explains the high incidence of lichen sclerosus with HPV-induced lesions, which turned out to be differentiated VIN instead of the nowadays socalled usual VIN lesions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10 It has been hypothesized that differentiated VIN may develop from lichen sclerosus and that it carries a higher malignant potential than lichen sclerosus does, 3,13-17 but its role as a premalignant lesion has not been accepted by all pathologists. 18 We hypothesize that of all lesions that have been diagnosed as lichen sclerosus in the past, a substantial part might currently be diagnosed as differentiated VIN.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%