2010
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.m109.081182
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

p53 Binding to Nucleosomal DNA Depends on the Rotational Positioning of DNA Response Element

Abstract: The sequence-specific binding to DNA is crucial for the p53 tumor suppressor function. To investigate the constraints imposed on p53-DNA recognition by nucleosomal organization, we studied binding of the p53 DNA binding domain (p53DBD) and full-length wild-type p53 protein to a single p53 response element (p53RE) placed near the nucleosomal dyad in six rotational settings. We demonstrate that the strongest p53 binding occurs when the p53RE in the nucleosome is bent in the same direction as observed for the p53… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
51
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
5
51
0
Order By: Relevance
“…5G). Taken together, our data thus provide a genome-wide view of TP53 and TP63 as pioneer factors, as suggested by previous observations that some TP53 binding sites are nucleosomal (Lidor Nili et al 2010;Sahu et al 2010;Laptenko et al 2011;Cui and Zhurkin 2014). We speculate that the pioneer activity of TP53 is a crucial, intrinsic property of the TP53 protein and contributes to its tumor suppressive function by allowing for discrimination of its response elements in many chromatin contexts.…”
Section: Tp53 Family Pioneer Activity At Enhancer Elementssupporting
confidence: 56%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…5G). Taken together, our data thus provide a genome-wide view of TP53 and TP63 as pioneer factors, as suggested by previous observations that some TP53 binding sites are nucleosomal (Lidor Nili et al 2010;Sahu et al 2010;Laptenko et al 2011;Cui and Zhurkin 2014). We speculate that the pioneer activity of TP53 is a crucial, intrinsic property of the TP53 protein and contributes to its tumor suppressive function by allowing for discrimination of its response elements in many chromatin contexts.…”
Section: Tp53 Family Pioneer Activity At Enhancer Elementssupporting
confidence: 56%
“…S4B). This suggests that TP53 may act as a pioneer factor, binding directly to its response element in the context of a nucleosome, as was previously suggested for TP53 acting at individual binding sites (Lidor Nili et al 2010;Sahu et al 2010;Laptenko et al 2011;Cui and Zhurkin 2014). We therefore examined nucleosome enrichment using published genome-wide mononucleosome (MNase) data from IMR90 fibroblasts (Kelly et al 2012).…”
Section: Tp53 Binds To Inaccessible Chromatin Lacking H3k4 Methylationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Experiments involving in vitro p53 binding to the RE localized within mononucleosome reconstituted with either H2A or H2A.Z may provide insight into the relative affinities of such substrates toward p53. A different mechanism for p53-nucleosome interaction was proposed by Sahu et al based on the results of an elegant in vitro study (30). The authors suggest that orientation of the p53 binding site on a nucleosome in conjuction with a nucleosomal positioning sequence may preset the p53 RE in a way that is easily accessible to p53.…”
Section: Localized P53-dependent Eviction Of Nucleosomes Occurs At Thmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the presence of TREs indicates a potential involvement of AP-1-regulated transcription, some degenerate sequences that are similar but not identical to the TRE seem to be recognized by selective AP-1 or bZIP complexes (7). This situation is further complicated by the fact that not every putative binding site is recognized by its cognate trans-acting factors, considering the dynamics of nucleosomal histones that may or may not present the sequence element in the right configuration accessible for direct protein-DNA interaction (8). Genome-wide surveys of transcription factor binding sites also uncover many cis-acting elements that do not conform to the consensus of factor binding sites (9).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%