2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2004.12.053
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

p53 and mdm2 as prognostic indicators in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer: A multivariate analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

3
29
1
3

Year Published

2006
2006
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
3
29
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Again, the prognostic value of MDM2 expression in ovarian cancer is controversial. Two studies found no prognostic relevance of MDM2 expression in ovarian cancer (29,30), whereas Dogan et al reported a significantly impaired overall survival in MDM2 positive as compared to MDM2 negative ovarian carcinomas (31).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Again, the prognostic value of MDM2 expression in ovarian cancer is controversial. Two studies found no prognostic relevance of MDM2 expression in ovarian cancer (29,30), whereas Dogan et al reported a significantly impaired overall survival in MDM2 positive as compared to MDM2 negative ovarian carcinomas (31).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Aynı konuda, Türkiye'den yapılmış çalışmalarda da, %41.6 ile %72.5 arasında değişen oranlarda TP53 ekspresyonu bildirilmiştir (31,(33)(34)(35)(36)(37)(38).…”
Section: Overin Yüzey Epitelinde Tp53 Ekspresyonuunclassified
“…Milner ve arkadaşlarının çalışmalarında da, yüksek dereceli seröz karsinomlarda, endometrioid ve müsinöz karsinomlara göre daha sık TP53 mutasyonları saptanmıştır (9). Yine, ülkemizden Doğan ve arkadaşlarının çalışmalarında da (n=82), TP53 ekspresyonunun, seröz subtip ile ilişkili olduğu gösterilmiştir (33). Çalışmamızda da, seröz karsinomların %42.9'unda, tümör hüc-relerinin %80'inden fazlasında TP53 ekspresyonu görülürken; bu oran, non-seröz karsinomlarda %15.9 idi.…”
Section: Overin Yüzey Epitelinde Tp53 Ekspresyonuunclassified
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Grade not determined (64%) 33/46 (72) (Gadducci et al, 2006) 47/71 (66) (Havrilesky et al, 2003) 16/26 (62) (Caduff et al, 1999) 14/31 (45) (Fujita et al, 1994) 11/20 (55) (Henriksen et al, 1994) 18/23 (78) (Renninson et al, 1994) 31/42 (74) (Dogan et al, 2005) 73/126 (58) (Eltabbakh et al, 1997) Clear cell (8%) 6/38 (17) (Ho et al, 2001) 0/4 (0) (Otis et al, 2000) 1/12 (8) (Caduff et al, 1999) Endometrioid (45%) 5/15 (33) (Dogan et al, 2005) 7/13 (54) (Henriksen et al, 1994) 13/27 (48) (Caduff et al, 1999) Mucinous (19%) 1/12 (8) (Dogan et al, 2005) 3/12 (25) (Renninson et al, 1994) 3/11 (27) (Henriksen et al, 1994) 3/21 (14) (Caduff et al, 1999) (Hashiguchi et al, 2001) 70/117 (60) (Saegusa et al, 2001) 28/82 (34) (Havrilesky et al, 2001) 9/73 (12) (Tachibana et al, 2003) 23/107 (21) (Hashiguchi et al, 2001) 60/134 (45) (Bali et al, 2004) RB Homozygous mutation (9%) 1/24 (4) (Sasano et al, 1990) 2/15 (13) Loss of or aberrant expression (19%) 2/25 (8) (Dodson et al, 1994) 2/26 (8) (Kim et al, 1994) 3/22 (14) (Taylor et al, 1995) 7/34 (21) (Niemann et al, 1998) 2/59 (3) (Kusume et al, 1999) 5/46 (11) (Hashiguchi et al, 2001) 7/9 (78) (Gras et al, 2001) 10/84 (12) (Havrilesky et al, 2001) 1/78 (1) (Konstantinidou et al, 2003) 28/134 (21) (Bali et al, 2004) 12/107 (37) (Hashiguchi et al, 2...…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%