P50 sensory gating and attentional performance

Wan, Li; Friedman, Bruce H.; Boutros, Nash N.; Crawford, Helen J.

doi:10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2007.10.008

Cited by 86 publications

(77 citation statements)

References 43 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Several studies demonstrated associations between the strength of P50 and performance on attention or detection tasks (Wan et al, 2008;Thomas et al, 2010). P50 has also been shown to play a role in the maintaining of auditory attentive state (Wan et al, 2008). The findings during passive listening are consistent with the hypothesis that Go/NoGo training modified low-level stimulus representations.…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 62%

“…The decrease in response strength of P50 generators associated with learning to respond to Go stimuli may reflect facilitated access for these stimuli to reach higher processing stages. Several studies demonstrated associations between the strength of P50 and performance on attention or detection tasks (Wan et al, 2008;Thomas et al, 2010). P50 has also been shown to play a role in the maintaining of auditory attentive state (Wan et al, 2008).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Brain Dynamics Underlying Training-Induced Improvement in Suppressing Inappropriate Action

Manuel¹,

Grivel²,

Bernasconi³

et al. 2010

J. Neurosci.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Inhibitory control, a core component of executive functions, refers to our ability to suppress intended or ongoing cognitive or motor processes. Mostly based on Go/NoGo paradigms, a considerable amount of literature reports that inhibitory control of responses to "NoGo" stimuli is mediated by top-down mechanisms manifesting ϳ200 ms after stimulus onset within frontoparietal networks. However, whether inhibitory functions in humans can be trained and the supporting neurophysiological mechanisms remain unresolved. We addressed these issues by contrasting auditory evoked potentials (AEPs) to left-lateralized "Go" and right NoGo stimuli recorded at the beginning versus the end of 30 min of active auditory spatial Go/NoGo training, as well as during passive listening of the same stimuli before versus after the training session, generating two separate 2 ϫ 2 withinsubject designs. Training improved Go/NoGo proficiency. Response times to Go stimuli decreased. During active training, AEPs to NoGo, but not Go, stimuli modulated topographically with training 61-104 ms after stimulus onset, indicative of changes in the underlying brain network. Source estimations revealed that this modulation followed from decreased activity within left parietal cortices, which in turn predicted the extent of behavioral improvement. During passive listening, in contrast, effects were limited to topographic modulations of AEPs in response to Go stimuli over the 31-81 ms interval, mediated by decreased right anterior temporoparietal activity. We discuss our results in terms of the development of an automatic and bottom-up form of inhibitory control with training and a differential effect of Go/NoGo training during active executive control versus passive listening conditions.

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 62%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Brain Dynamics Underlying Training-Induced Improvement in Suppressing Inappropriate Action

Manuel¹,

Grivel²,

Bernasconi³

et al. 2010

J. Neurosci.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In Table 4, the means of amplitudes of the first sound are all larger than the means of amplitudes of the second sound, and the P-values are all less than 0.05. The result of Table 4 is fully consistent with sensory gating [24,[26][27][28].…”

Section: Cognitive Testsupporting

confidence: 80%

“…This function is a mechanism, particularly important for the brain to adapt to new environments, by which the brain filters redundant information and maintains the integrity of cognitive function [24]. Sensory gating protects the cognition by affecting the cognitive processes such as attention and working memory [25].…”

Section: Cognitive Testmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

A classification-based method to estimate event-related potentials from single trial EEG

Huang

Zhou

et al. 2012

Sci. China Life Sci.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A novel method based on machine learning is developed to estimate event-related potentials from single trial electroencephalography. This paper builds a basic framework using classification and an optimization model based on this framework for estimating event-related potentials. Then the SingleTrialEM algorithm is derived by introducing a logistic regression model, which could be obtained by training before SingleTrialEM is used, to instantiate the optimization model. The simulation tests demonstrate that the proposed method is correct and solid. The advantage of this method is verified by the comparison between this method and the Woody filter in simulation tests. Also, the cognitive test results are consistent with the conclusions of cognitive science.classification, spatial-temporal signal model, optimization, logistic regression, SingleTrialEM

show abstract

Atypical function of auditory sensory gating in children with developmental dyslexia: Investigating its relationship with cognitive abilities

Panahi,

Akbari,

Jarollahi

et al. 2023

Dyslexia

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Impairments of auditory processing are among frequent findings in dyslexia. However, it is unclear how auditory signals are gated from brainstem to higher central processing stages in these individuals. The present study was done to investigate auditory sensory gating in children with developmental dyslexia (DD), and to determine whether sensory gating correlates with performance on behavioural tasks. Auditory sensory gating at P50, N1 and P2 waves was evaluated in two groups including 20 children with DD and 19 children with typical reading development (TRD). Behavioural tests were used to evaluate phonological working memory (PWM) and selective attention abilities. Sensory gating in children with DD was significantly less efficient than their peers at P50, N1 and P2 waves. Lower auditory evoked potential (AEP) amplitudes were found in the DD group. The children with TRD scored better in all the behavioural tests. Relationships were reported between sensory gating at P50, N1, P2 and behavioural performance in the two groups. Children with dyslexia had deficient sensory gating in comparison with controls. In addition, children with dyslexia experienced problems with PWM and selective attention tasks. The function of sensory gating was associated with attentional and PWM performances in this group.

show abstract

P50 sensory gating and attentional performance

Cited by 86 publications

References 43 publications

Brain Dynamics Underlying Training-Induced Improvement in Suppressing Inappropriate Action

Brain Dynamics Underlying Training-Induced Improvement in Suppressing Inappropriate Action

A classification-based method to estimate event-related potentials from single trial EEG

Atypical function of auditory sensory gating in children with developmental dyslexia: Investigating its relationship with cognitive abilities

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About