P3541Change in left ventricular ejection fraction and outcome in heart failure patients with mid-range ejection fraction: from the HIJ-HF prospective study

Abstract

Introduction Heart failure (HF) is categorized on the basis of the eft ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). The European Society of Cardiology has proposed mid-range EF (HFmrEF) as a new category of HF that includes patients with an LVEF of 40–49%. However, the clinical characteristics, change in LVEF following treatment, and outcome of patients with HFmrEF remain clear. Methods We conducted a prospective observational study of Japanese hospitalized HF patients between 2015 and 2018 at a single-center (HIJ-HF III). HFmrEF was defined as 40–49% of LVEF on echocardiography at admission. We followed these patients and performed echocardiography to assess LVEF per year after hospital discharge. Clinical outcome was death from any cause. Methods and results We studied 138 patients with HFmrEF (median age 71 years, 69% male). They had 32% of ischemic heart disease, 9% of New York Heart Association functional class III or IV at discharge. During median follow-up of 20 [13–28] months, we assessed change in LVEF for 110 patients with HFmrEF. One year after hospital discharge, 49 patients (44%) improved LVEF (≥50%) and 21 patients (19%) reduced LVEF (<40%). HFmrEF patients who reduced LVEF (<40%) were significantly higher mortality rate than those who improved LVEF (≥50%) (14% vs. 2%, p<0.05) (Figure). Conclusions This study demonstrated that 44% of HFmrEF patients improved LVEF following treatment but 19% patients reduced LVEF. Reduced LVEF was associated with poor prognosis.

How to Improve the Cardiac Function and Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Heart Failure with a Mid-range Ejection Fraction

“…demonstrated that the worsening of the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) one year after discharge was associated with a worse prognosis than an improved LVEF among hospitalized patients with heart failure with a mid-range ejection fraction (HFmrEF) (1). Several concerns should be addressed to improve their findings.…”