P35 The physics forceps – a breakthrough in dental extraction technology

Perkins, N.J.; Perez, H.M.; Misch, Carl E.; Golden, R.

doi:10.1016/s0266-4356(10)60126-x

Cited by 4 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The reason which was cited for decreased facial plate fracture is due to the compressive force applied by the bumper of the physics forceps to the gums and bone and is over a greater surface area that also permits the lingual plate to expand more and hence the facial plate is prevented from fracture. [ 13 14 16 ]…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Efficacy of the Atraumatic Physics Forceps Over Conventional Extraction Forceps in Extraction of Tooth—Does it Offer an Alternative in All Types of Extraction or Only can be Used in Few Selected Types of Extraction

Laskar

Singh

Suman

et al. 2022

Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

We conducted this study to evaluate the efficacy of physics forceps in dental extractions as compared with conventional forceps and as well as to evaluate its atraumatic point of view. Materials and Methods: A total of 200 healthy adult patients were included in the study who reported for dental extractions, divided into two groups each containing 100 patients. The patients were randomly allocated into either group by lottery method. Results: Operating time in the physics forceps group was found to be significantly reduced as well as lesser incidence of dry socket was noted which was statistically significant on the 2 nd day postoperatively. However, incidence of root fracture, buccal plate fracture, and gingival lacerations were not found to be statistically significant but their occurrence was less in the physics forceps group as compared with the conventional forceps group. Conclusion: To conclude, we can say that extractions done by physics forceps results in significant reduction in unnecessary trauma as well as stress to both the operator and patient. The forceps is an atraumatic extraction system which is a boon for the profession, thereby reducing ridge deformities and preparing the patients for future prosthesis.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Efficacy of the Atraumatic Physics Forceps Over Conventional Extraction Forceps in Extraction of Tooth—Does it Offer an Alternative in All Types of Extraction or Only can be Used in Few Selected Types of Extraction

Laskar

Singh

Suman

et al. 2022

Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Overall success rate was found out to be 83%; 89% with single-rooted tooth, whereas 43% multi-rooted teeth. 20 Feck, 3 Leziy, 21 Nazarian, 22 Timothy, 23 Perkins et al, 24 Patil et al, 2 Mandal et al, 25 El-Kenawy and Ahmed, 26 as they find this instrument ideal for atraumatic tooth removal followed by immediate implant placement. Advantage of this set of armamentarium is minimal force requirement with maximum output.…”

Section: Benex Systemmentioning

confidence: 99%

Advances in Methods of Atraumatic Tooth Removal: An Update

Jain¹,

Oswal²,

Purohit³

et al. 2017

IJPCDR

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Physics Forceps are one of the latest innovations among instruments that aid in achieving dental extraction in a less traumatic fashion [ 16 ]. Physics Forceps works through a class 1 lever, creep, and a shear component of force by applying a biomechanical rationale during the tooth extraction process.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparative evaluation of efficacy of Physics Forceps versus conventional forceps in pediatric dental extractions: a prospective randomized study

Elicherla

Bandi

Nunna

et al. 2021

J Dent Anesth Pain Med

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background This study aimed to determine the efficacy of Physics Forceps in pediatric dental extractions. Methods This was a double-blind, randomized controlled trial with a parallel-arm design and identical allocation ratio (1:1). Children (n=104) were randomly divided into two groups for extraction of mandibular primary teeth (group I: Physics Forceps; group II: conventional forceps). The outcome variables assessed in the study were the time taken for extraction, pre- and postoperative anxiety (using RMS pictorial scale), incidence of fractured teeth, and postoperative pain on the first and third days (using the Wong-Baker faces pain scale). Results A significant reduction (P < 0.001) in intraoperative time, anxiety, and incidence of tooth fracture was confined to group I. The pain significantly reduced from the first to the third postoperative day in both groups, but the mean reduction in RMS scores in the physics forceps group was far better than that in the conventional forceps group. Conclusion Physics Forceps aid in extraction of primary teeth with minimal trauma to supporting structures, as well as reducing anxiety in the pediatric population.

show abstract

P35 The physics forceps – a breakthrough in dental extraction technology

Cited by 4 publications

References 0 publications

Efficacy of the Atraumatic Physics Forceps Over Conventional Extraction Forceps in Extraction of Tooth—Does it Offer an Alternative in All Types of Extraction or Only can be Used in Few Selected Types of Extraction

Efficacy of the Atraumatic Physics Forceps Over Conventional Extraction Forceps in Extraction of Tooth—Does it Offer an Alternative in All Types of Extraction or Only can be Used in Few Selected Types of Extraction

Advances in Methods of Atraumatic Tooth Removal: An Update

Comparative evaluation of efficacy of Physics Forceps versus conventional forceps in pediatric dental extractions: a prospective randomized study

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About