2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2005.07.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

P300-based brain computer interface: Reliability and performance in healthy and paralysed participants

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
174
6
9

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 282 publications
(192 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
3
174
6
9
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, voluntary modulation of brain activity-as in the case of MI-allows a more direct and active BCI experience, but the training phase may last longer [6]. Over the last few years both types of system have been widely exploited to demonstrate the possibility of using EEG based BCIs for restoring the control and communication capabilities of disabled people [7][8][9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, voluntary modulation of brain activity-as in the case of MI-allows a more direct and active BCI experience, but the training phase may last longer [6]. Over the last few years both types of system have been widely exploited to demonstrate the possibility of using EEG based BCIs for restoring the control and communication capabilities of disabled people [7][8][9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors showed that a target probability of 25 % dependably elicited a P300 response, and that the response remained stable over a period of 10 sessions in people with and without ALS. Piccione et al (2006) also tested a four-choice P300 paradigm with seven healthy volunteers and five individuals with tetraplegia, including one individual with ALS. In this paradigm, the participants attended to one of four flashing arrows to indicate which direction they wished to move a cursor: up, down, left, or right.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Samples between 550 and 800 ms resulted in (almost) as high classification accuracy as the epoch around the P300 (i.e., between 300 and 550 ms). Several P300 papers show a similar difference between targets and standards [10,18,[47][48][49]. However, though the figures show a negativity after the P300 for targets versus standards, none of the authors comment on the effect.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 64%