Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2009
DOI: 10.1016/s0049-3848(09)70075-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

P30 PAI-1 4G/5G polymorphism detection and obstetric complications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
3
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Contradictory of the recent study by Subrt et al [38] that demonstrated a strong positive association between PAI-1 and ACE mutations and pregnancy loss [38], in our study and other authors, no relationship was founded between the presence of ACE and PAI-1 mutant alleles and RPL [8,15,21,22]…”
Section: Ace and Pai-1contrasting
confidence: 65%
“…Contradictory of the recent study by Subrt et al [38] that demonstrated a strong positive association between PAI-1 and ACE mutations and pregnancy loss [38], in our study and other authors, no relationship was founded between the presence of ACE and PAI-1 mutant alleles and RPL [8,15,21,22]…”
Section: Ace and Pai-1contrasting
confidence: 65%
“…Sun et al 26 confirmed that homozygosity for PAI-1 4G polymorphisms is significantly higher in patients with RPL, which may result in increased PAI-1 concentrations and hypofibrinolysis and contribute to early pregnancy loss. Gumpel et al 29 did not find any association between this polymorphism and early or late pregnancy loss. Thus, they suggested that the 4G variant of the PAI-1 gene may predispose a subset of celiac women to pregnancy loss.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Butchholz et al (2003) reported a tendency towards the presence of higher frequencies of 4G/4G carriers among patients with a history of two or more consecutive unexplained spontaneous miscarriages (39.1 %) compared to controls (32.3 %), but the difference was not significant (P =0.22) [1]. In addition, no association between this polymorphism and early or late pregnancy loss was observed by Gumpel et al [24].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%