2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.repce.2020.09.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

P2Y12 inhibitor loading dose before catheterization in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: Is this the best strategy?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The main reason to justify this nding is the fact that there was a signi cantly higher use of bailout GP-IIbIIIa in the downstream treatment cohort in several studies, drugs usually associated with increased risk of bleeding. [13][14][15][16][17][18] Also, the strategy chosen by the operator regarding medical and invasive therapy might be in uenced by the presence of pretreatment. This carries the risk of bias since the majority of included studies are observational and non-blinded.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main reason to justify this nding is the fact that there was a signi cantly higher use of bailout GP-IIbIIIa in the downstream treatment cohort in several studies, drugs usually associated with increased risk of bleeding. [13][14][15][16][17][18] Also, the strategy chosen by the operator regarding medical and invasive therapy might be in uenced by the presence of pretreatment. This carries the risk of bias since the majority of included studies are observational and non-blinded.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main reason to justify this finding is the fact that there was a significantly higher use of bailout GP-IIbIIIa in the downstream treatment cohort in several studies, drugs usually associated with increased risk of bleeding. 11,13,16,20,22,27 Also, the strategy chosen by the operator regarding medical and invasive therapy may be influenced by the presence of pretreatment. This carries the risk of bias, because most included studies are observational and nonblinded.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%