2006 IEEE International Conference on E-Business Engineering (ICEBE'06) 2006
DOI: 10.1109/icebe.2006.78
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

P2P-based Trust Model for E-Commerce

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…So, the total financial risk to the risk assessing agent in its business activity is a combination of the financial loss that it may experience from both the dependable and nondependable events. Approaches have been proposed in the literature which consider the financial resources in the business activity [12][13][14][15][16], but these approaches consider only the dependable events of the activity. They do not take into consideration the existence of non-dependable criteria and, subsequently, the financial loss determined by those approaches does not express the total financial loss that the risk assessing agent could experience in its business activity.…”
Section: Problem Definationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So, the total financial risk to the risk assessing agent in its business activity is a combination of the financial loss that it may experience from both the dependable and nondependable events. Approaches have been proposed in the literature which consider the financial resources in the business activity [12][13][14][15][16], but these approaches consider only the dependable events of the activity. They do not take into consideration the existence of non-dependable criteria and, subsequently, the financial loss determined by those approaches does not express the total financial loss that the risk assessing agent could experience in its business activity.…”
Section: Problem Definationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gilber et al [6] pointed out that reputation system should weighted toward rewarding desired behaviors to ensure positive reputations are difficult but not impossible to acquire and good trust rating are relatively easy to diminish since system allows fluctuations of a node's reputation in both directions. Su et al [7] proposed a P2P trust model we called it SUModel, which can diminish risk factors by referral reputation of other peers, but when the direct reputation changes take place, the variation of trust rating change a little. X. Gui et al [8] proposed the trust architecture for Grid security solution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This analysis does not take into account the resources that the risk assessing agent is going to invest in the interaction. A lot of work has been done in the literature to determine and evaluate the trust in an interaction [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…T PCn tz = (Commitment Level Cn ) (10) where, 'P' represents the risk assessed agent, 'Cn' represents the assessment criterion, in which the trustworthiness of the risk assessed agent 'P' is being determined,…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%