2012
DOI: 10.1002/uog.12171
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

P29.04: Ultrasound (in)accuracy: it's in the formulae not in the technique: revisiting the accuracy of abdominal circumference measurement in term pregnancies

Abstract: error of estimated fetal weight was 238 g (absolute range 3 g-855 g, real range −855 g-792 g), with a mean absolute percentage error of 6.7% (absolute range 0.08%-21%, real range −21% −20%). Twenty three infants (6.6%) had a birth weight < 10 th centile when matched for gestation, including three infants with a birth weight < 2.5 kg. The mean error in estimated fetal weight in these infants was 6.3%. Forty seven infants (13.4%) had a birth weight > 90 th centile. The mean error in estimated fetal weight in thi… Show more

Help me understand this report

This publication either has no citations yet, or we are still processing them

Set email alert for when this publication receives citations?

See others like this or search for similar articles