2011
DOI: 10.1080/02533839.2011.591548
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

P25 scoring method for the collapse vulnerability assessment of R/C buildings

Abstract: It is historically a fact that Turkey experiences frequent earthquakes, on the order of one damaging earthquake of magnitude 6 to 7 approximately every two years, causing extensive losses to economy, life and limb. Every strong earthquake leaves behind poverty and tens of thousands of homeless people. In order to mitigate especially the losses of life due to earthquakes, a rapid scoring technique called the P25 -Preliminary Assessment Method, is proposed herein. The purpose of the method is to determine, for a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
14
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The Nikiforov-Uvarovmethod [1,39] was proposed to solve second-order differential equation of the form…”
Section: Hulthen Potentialmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The Nikiforov-Uvarovmethod [1,39] was proposed to solve second-order differential equation of the form…”
Section: Hulthen Potentialmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The DFPEP model which incorporates these special well-known potentials can be used in the study of nuclear structure in the spherical shell model to obtain the energy splitting and the magic numbers [32]. Consequently, one can say authoritatively that the achievement of quantum mechanics in the description of the physics of atomic and sub-atomic particles can not be overemphasized [33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48]. The DFPEP is defined as [31]    …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, when the Marmara and Düzce earthquakes of 1999 are examined, even though there were serious fatalities and material losses, only 6 % of buildings within the total structure stock of that time completely collapsed or sustained serious damage (Tezcan et al, 2011). In this situation, there are significant differences between the criteria of regulation and the results of buildings that have experienced the test of a real earthquake.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second approach is called the preliminary seismic vulnerability assessment or Level 2 assessment. It requires some basic calculations considering the load carrying characteristics of the building, soil condition, concrete strength, visual quality, and irregularities [8,[12][13][14][15][16][17][18]. Moreover, although all procedures in this group can be used to evaluate vulnerable buildings in a building stock, it can also be utilized to evaluate seismic performance of a single building with simple equations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%