2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtho.2019.08.1809
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

P2.14-24 An Open-Label Randomized Phase II Study of Combining Osimertinib With and Without Ramucirumab in TKI-Naïve EGFR-Mutant Metastatic NSCLC

Abstract: Background: Lorlatinib, also known as PF-6463922, is a third-generation anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) tyrosine kinase inhibitor that had been approved clinic treatment with patients who failed previous ALK inhibitors. However, the growth inhibitory effects of Lorlatinib on NSCLC and the underlying mechanism. Method: The growth inhibitory effects of Lorlatinib were investigated in H3122 and H2228 cell lines.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additional combination regimens have been presented in abstract form including combination amivantamab, a bispecific antibody against EGFR and MET, plus lazertinib, a third-generation EGFR kinase inhibitor, as well as osimertinib plus ramucirumab, a vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) monoclonal antibody. 32 Both of these combinations demonstrated improvement in PFS compared to osimertinib alone at the cost of increased toxicity, although peer-reviewed publications were pending at the time of this update. Thus, although combination therapies may prolong PFS, the lack of clear OS benefit and greater associated toxicity…”
Section: Literature Review Update and Clinical Interpretationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additional combination regimens have been presented in abstract form including combination amivantamab, a bispecific antibody against EGFR and MET, plus lazertinib, a third-generation EGFR kinase inhibitor, as well as osimertinib plus ramucirumab, a vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) monoclonal antibody. 32 Both of these combinations demonstrated improvement in PFS compared to osimertinib alone at the cost of increased toxicity, although peer-reviewed publications were pending at the time of this update. Thus, although combination therapies may prolong PFS, the lack of clear OS benefit and greater associated toxicity…”
Section: Literature Review Update and Clinical Interpretationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared to osimertinib there was improvement in PFS (23.7 vs. 16.6 months, HR: 0.70 (95% CI 0.58–0.85, p < 0.001), including in patients with a history of brain metastases. Lastly, the phase 2 RAMOS trial evaluated patients with metastatic EGFRm NSCLC who were treated with osimertinib plus ramucirumab 10 mg/kg via intravenous infusion every 3 weeks compared to osimertinib alone and showed an improved PFS with combination therapy (24.8 vs. 15.6 months (HR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.32–0.93; p = 0.023) [ 63 ]. Although these approaches demonstrate improved PFS, improvement in OS remains to be seen and these regimens will need to be carefully balanced with the increased toxicity and costs associated with these combination therapies.…”
Section: Role Of Ctdna In Advanced Egfrm Nsclcmentioning
confidence: 99%