2015
DOI: 10.1136/sextrans-2015-052126.198
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

P155 “time in clinic” survey to evaluate the potential for use of online registration: Abstract P155 Table 1

Abstract: insight into the type of information patients most prefer to see in order to enhance patient experience. Aim(s)/objectives To conduct a patient survey of preferences for information provided in sexual health clinic waiting rooms. Methods 133 consecutive patients attending the integrated clinic were asked to complete a simple questionnaire covering the following areas: (1) how much attention is given to the information available; (2) Which types of information are most useful; (3) Preference for pictures, writt… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

2
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…23 24 Although studies suggest a limit of 30 min to wait for results, [25][26][27][28] experience from our service indicates that patients would be prepared to wait longer than 20 min for their result. 29 However, much of the evidence is from modelling and hypothetical views of clinicians and/or patients, 10-12 25-28 30 with little real-life implementation evaluation, 31 and rarely considering the complexity of patients' visits including both asymptomatic and symptomatic patients with multiple needs, for example, female contraception. There is an urgent need to evaluate staff and patient preferences and clinical benefits and cost-effectiveness in practice.…”
Section: Strengths and Limitations Of This Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…23 24 Although studies suggest a limit of 30 min to wait for results, [25][26][27][28] experience from our service indicates that patients would be prepared to wait longer than 20 min for their result. 29 However, much of the evidence is from modelling and hypothetical views of clinicians and/or patients, 10-12 25-28 30 with little real-life implementation evaluation, 31 and rarely considering the complexity of patients' visits including both asymptomatic and symptomatic patients with multiple needs, for example, female contraception. There is an urgent need to evaluate staff and patient preferences and clinical benefits and cost-effectiveness in practice.…”
Section: Strengths and Limitations Of This Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Patient waiting time data were compared with those observed with the existing configuration of the service. 10 …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Patient waiting time data were compared with those observed with the existing configuration of the service. 10 Patient and public involvement No patient or public was involved in the design, or conduct, or reporting, or dissemination plans of our research.…”
Section: Model Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations