2006
DOI: 10.4161/cc.5.7.2625
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

p14ARF Triggers G2 Arrest Through ERK-Mediated Cdc25C Phosphorylation, Ubiquitination and Proteasomal Degradation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
35
1
3

Year Published

2008
2008
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
3
35
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…5), suggesting that the UPS-dependent synaptophysin degradation is mediated by ERK activation. This is supported by several recent studies showing that the activation of the ERK pathway promoted the UPS-mediated degradation of the cell cycle protein Cdc25 (40,41) and the cell survival factor Bim (42). In the Drosophila eye, ERK signaling was shown to be required for the physiologic activity of Sina (seven in absentia), a key molecule for normal photoreceptor development (43).…”
Section: At1r-mediated Retinal Dysfunction In Diabetessupporting
confidence: 58%
“…5), suggesting that the UPS-dependent synaptophysin degradation is mediated by ERK activation. This is supported by several recent studies showing that the activation of the ERK pathway promoted the UPS-mediated degradation of the cell cycle protein Cdc25 (40,41) and the cell survival factor Bim (42). In the Drosophila eye, ERK signaling was shown to be required for the physiologic activity of Sina (seven in absentia), a key molecule for normal photoreceptor development (43).…”
Section: At1r-mediated Retinal Dysfunction In Diabetessupporting
confidence: 58%
“…There is contradictory evidence of a role for MAPK signaling in G 2 and mitosis in mammalian cells (5,6,8), but recent evidence suggests that some of this maybe attributed to cell lineage-dependent differences (44). MAPK signaling has also been implicated in the G 2 arrest associated with overexpression of BRCA1 and p14ARF, although these mechanisms involved Chk1, differentiating them from the present study (45,46).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 56%
“…Thus, the level within the signal transduction pathway, which is responsible for overstimulation, along with cell type may influence phenotypic outcome (see section II.B on ERKs). Furthermore, ERK also increases CDK inhibitor proteins p21, p27, and p53, among others, which results in cell cycle arrest (Smalley, 2003;Dhillon et al, 2007) and phosphorylation of CDC25c, leading to its ubiquitination and proteasomal degradation (Eymin et al, 2006), whereas Raf can also induce cell cycle arrest via p21 (Smalley, 2003). Thus, tumors must counteract this effect and can do so via AKT and RhoGTPase proteins (Dhillon et al, 2007).…”
Section: Mitogen-activated Protein Kinase and Cancer: An Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this scenario, MKP-1 expression could be deleterious. However, Ras overactivation, Raf, and ERK can induce cell cycle arrest (Hirakawa and Ruley, 1988;Smalley, 2003;Eymin et al, 2006;Dhillon et al, 2007). In this situation in which the neu oncogene correlates with MKP-1, phosphatase activity may reduce strong sustained ERK activity, favoring senescence or differentiation, which leads to sustained weak activity or transient ERK activity favoring proliferation (see sections II and V).…”
Section: A Breast Cancermentioning
confidence: 99%