2008
DOI: 10.1016/s0966-6362(08)70125-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

P056 Gait analysis of patients with a minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty compared to a standard THA in the early postoperative period

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Most studies on gait function after THA focus mainly on the outcomes of different surgical techniques, such as direct anterior vs posterior approach, minimally invasive vs standard operative technique, and resurfacing vs no resurfacing. [8][9][10] For patients with Crowe type II, III, and IV DDH after THA, leg-length discrepancy is inevitable because of high hip center reconstruction or subtrochanteric osteotomy. In a previous study, the gait of 22 patients with Crowe type IV DDH after unilateral THA (with leg-length discrepancies corrected to within 2 cm) was compared with the gait of untreated unilateral Crowe type IV DDH patients without pain (with leg-length discrepancies greater than 2.5 cm).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most studies on gait function after THA focus mainly on the outcomes of different surgical techniques, such as direct anterior vs posterior approach, minimally invasive vs standard operative technique, and resurfacing vs no resurfacing. [8][9][10] For patients with Crowe type II, III, and IV DDH after THA, leg-length discrepancy is inevitable because of high hip center reconstruction or subtrochanteric osteotomy. In a previous study, the gait of 22 patients with Crowe type IV DDH after unilateral THA (with leg-length discrepancies corrected to within 2 cm) was compared with the gait of untreated unilateral Crowe type IV DDH patients without pain (with leg-length discrepancies greater than 2.5 cm).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%