2022
DOI: 10.1097/01.hs9.0000829588.31575.a9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

P04: Daratumumab Plus Bortezomib and Dexamethasone Versus Bortezomib and Dexamethasone Alone in Patients With Previously Treated Multiple Myeloma: Overall Survival Results From the Phase 3 Castor Trial

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…7,8 In the CASTOR study, daratumumab, bortezomib and dexamethasone (DVd) demonstrated a significant improvement in overall survival over bortezomib and dexamethasone (Vd) for patients after 1-3 prior lines [hazard ratio (HR) 0.74; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.59-0.92; p = 0.0075]. [9][10][11] The most significant improvement was for those treated after one prior line (1PL) of therapy for whom PFS was 27 versus 7.9 months [HR, 0.22; 95% CI, 0.15-0.32; p < 0.0001, overall response rate (ORR) 92% vs. 74%; p < 0.0007] and OS not reached versus 47 months (HR 0.56; 95% CI, 0.39-0.8; p = 0.0013). [11][12][13] However, this trial incorporated biweekly bortezomib which limits tolerability due to treatmentemergent peripheral neuropathy 14 and the weekly schedule is commonly utilised in routine practice to mitigate this.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…7,8 In the CASTOR study, daratumumab, bortezomib and dexamethasone (DVd) demonstrated a significant improvement in overall survival over bortezomib and dexamethasone (Vd) for patients after 1-3 prior lines [hazard ratio (HR) 0.74; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.59-0.92; p = 0.0075]. [9][10][11] The most significant improvement was for those treated after one prior line (1PL) of therapy for whom PFS was 27 versus 7.9 months [HR, 0.22; 95% CI, 0.15-0.32; p < 0.0001, overall response rate (ORR) 92% vs. 74%; p < 0.0007] and OS not reached versus 47 months (HR 0.56; 95% CI, 0.39-0.8; p = 0.0013). [11][12][13] However, this trial incorporated biweekly bortezomib which limits tolerability due to treatmentemergent peripheral neuropathy 14 and the weekly schedule is commonly utilised in routine practice to mitigate this.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[9][10][11] The most significant improvement was for those treated after one prior line (1PL) of therapy for whom PFS was 27 versus 7.9 months [HR, 0.22; 95% CI, 0.15-0.32; p < 0.0001, overall response rate (ORR) 92% vs. 74%; p < 0.0007] and OS not reached versus 47 months (HR 0.56; 95% CI, 0.39-0.8; p = 0.0013). [11][12][13] However, this trial incorporated biweekly bortezomib which limits tolerability due to treatmentemergent peripheral neuropathy 14 and the weekly schedule is commonly utilised in routine practice to mitigate this. 15 Other anti-CD38 Mab combinations including carfilzomib have been evaluated at first relapse and may also be considered.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%