2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2016.10.157
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

P029 Effects of dual-mode non-invasive brain stimulation on freezing of gait in patients with Parkinson’s disease

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Dagan and colleague study [32] were the sole study to stimulate the mPFC and no significant improvement on FoG-Q score, with significant improvement in UPDRS III scores; no previous trials for effect of mPFC stimulation on FOG, and only previous literature [33,34] suggest a role in FOG pathophysiology. The dual-mode non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) involves simultaneous rTMS and tDCS stimulation had shown greater degree of improvement in terms of FOG-Q outcome compared to rTMS alone in previous studies [35,36], possibly due to their synergistic effect, and whether it should be implemented as superior technique to rTMS alone needs further studies. Another approach never implemented in the included studies is the neuro-navigational approach using MRI scan, while previous studies [37,38] showed enhanced responses to rTMS treatment in setting of the use of neuro-navigational methods to target a specific site.…”
Section: Strength and Limitation Points To The Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dagan and colleague study [32] were the sole study to stimulate the mPFC and no significant improvement on FoG-Q score, with significant improvement in UPDRS III scores; no previous trials for effect of mPFC stimulation on FOG, and only previous literature [33,34] suggest a role in FOG pathophysiology. The dual-mode non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) involves simultaneous rTMS and tDCS stimulation had shown greater degree of improvement in terms of FOG-Q outcome compared to rTMS alone in previous studies [35,36], possibly due to their synergistic effect, and whether it should be implemented as superior technique to rTMS alone needs further studies. Another approach never implemented in the included studies is the neuro-navigational approach using MRI scan, while previous studies [37,38] showed enhanced responses to rTMS treatment in setting of the use of neuro-navigational methods to target a specific site.…”
Section: Strength and Limitation Points To The Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent studies have examined the effects of tDCS, applied to either the primary motor cortex alone, or in combination with stimulation of prefrontal regions involved in executive function, on motor behavior and freezing in people with PD [30][31][32]. These studies showed that single [30] or repeated sessions [31,32] can reduce the incidence and duration FOG episodes and the time to complete timed up-and-go tasks. In particular, combined primary motor and dorsolateral prefrontal stimulation showed the most consistent results across subjects at reducing FOG events [30].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%