2012
DOI: 10.1186/1472-6882-12-s1-p34
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

P01.34. Use of plant bioassays in homeopathic basic research: a systematic review

Abstract: PurposeExperimental research on the effects of treatments with homeopathic preparations on plants was last reviewed in 1990. The objective was to compile a systematic literature review on plant bioassays in homeopathic basic research using predefined criteria. MethodsA literature search was carried out on publications that reported experiments with homeopathic preparations on whole plants, seeds, plant parts and cells from 1920 to 2010, in healthy, abiotically or biotically stressed conditions. Outcomes had to… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The final session of the symposium, devoted to laboratory models, summarised the findings of three recent reviews on the use of plants for basic research in homeopathy. 22 Few of the 157 publications identified and analysed meet the quality criteria set out in the recently published guidelines, 23,24 this presentation emphasised the need to conduct independent replications of experiments and use systematic negative controls to exclude falsepositives and negatives.…”
Section: Otherlaboratorymodelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The final session of the symposium, devoted to laboratory models, summarised the findings of three recent reviews on the use of plants for basic research in homeopathy. 22 Few of the 157 publications identified and analysed meet the quality criteria set out in the recently published guidelines, 23,24 this presentation emphasised the need to conduct independent replications of experiments and use systematic negative controls to exclude falsepositives and negatives.…”
Section: Otherlaboratorymodelsmentioning
confidence: 99%