2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2017.02.101
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

(P003) Delivery of Ultra-Rapid Flash Radiation Therapy and Demonstration of Normal Tissue Sparing After Abdominal Irradiation of Mice

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
86
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 103 publications
(92 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
5
86
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, FLASH may be able to disrupt and bypass ROS-mediated pathogenic cascades that normally lead to neurocognitive complications and associated pathology typically found after CONV irradiation of the brain. The absence of normal tissue toxicity observed after FLASH irradiation and reported here corroborates recent and older work from our laboratories and others on the normal brain, lung, skin, and gut (18,19,23,24) and, as recently reviewed (25), point to the general applicability of FLASH irradiation to avoid normal tissue injury. Normal tissue sparing reported here is especially relevant in the context of current treatment regimens for adult and pediatric brain tumors that elicit significant toxicities that negatively impact patient care and quality of life (5,26).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Thus, FLASH may be able to disrupt and bypass ROS-mediated pathogenic cascades that normally lead to neurocognitive complications and associated pathology typically found after CONV irradiation of the brain. The absence of normal tissue toxicity observed after FLASH irradiation and reported here corroborates recent and older work from our laboratories and others on the normal brain, lung, skin, and gut (18,19,23,24) and, as recently reviewed (25), point to the general applicability of FLASH irradiation to avoid normal tissue injury. Normal tissue sparing reported here is especially relevant in the context of current treatment regimens for adult and pediatric brain tumors that elicit significant toxicities that negatively impact patient care and quality of life (5,26).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Limiting the induction of toxicities to normal tissue would subsequently increase the therapeutic index of RT regimes (7). A number of recent studies have demonstrated that irradiation at ultra-high dose rates (FLASH) diminishes the severity of toxicities in normal tissues compared to irradiation at the conventional dose rates (CONV) currently used in clinical practice (8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18). Notably, limited data also shows that FLASH-RT reduces normal tissue toxicities whilst maintaining the anti-tumor response of CONV-RT (8-10, 15, 17, 19).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8 Using electron or photon RT, FLASH dose rateedependent normal tissue radioprotection has been demonstrated for functional and pathophysiologic outcomes in brain, lung, bowel, and skin. 1,4,[9][10][11][12][13] Although normal tissues are protected by FLASH RT, studies of orthotopic lung and ectopic head and neck cancers demonstrated no evidence of FLASH radioprotection. 1,4,14 In terms of dose rate thresholds, electron RT >60 Gy/s demonstrated complete or nearly complete protection against cognitive decline induced by 10 Gy whole brain irradiation in mice.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%