2018
DOI: 10.1007/s00605-018-1247-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

(p, q)-Regular operators between Banach lattices

Abstract: We study the class of (p, q)-regular operators between quasi-Banach lattices. In particular, a representation of this class as the dual of a certain tensor norm for Banach lattices is given. We also provide some factorization results for (p, q)-regular operators yielding new Marcinkiewicz-Zygmund type inequalities for Banach function spaces. An extension theorem for (q, ∞)regular operators defined on a subspace of Lq is also given.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For ϕ = φ = Id R , we get the definition of a (p, q)-regular operator [20,21]; the case p = q is the most relevant from the point of view of the classical theory [2].…”
Section: Separation Arguments For Lipschitz Pointwise Transformations...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For ϕ = φ = Id R , we get the definition of a (p, q)-regular operator [20,21]; the case p = q is the most relevant from the point of view of the classical theory [2].…”
Section: Separation Arguments For Lipschitz Pointwise Transformations...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We refer the reader to [31] for a more recent account on this and the closely related notions of (p, q)-regularity.…”
Section: Regular Operators On Subspaces Of L Pmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…those which can be written as a difference of two positive operators-, was first considered in [3] in connection with the interpolation theory of Banach lattices (and also implicitly in [19]). In particular, these operators are related to the so-called Marcinkiewicz-Zygmund inequalities [7] and other interpolation properties (see [25,27] for recent developments about this).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%