2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.quageo.2022.101420
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

P–PINI: A cosmogenic nuclide burial dating method for landscapes undergoing non-steady erosion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Further research is needed in this and similar landscapes to separate (i) exposure and burial from (ii) bedrock erosion histories and (iii) the effects of boulder transportation, disturbance, burial and recycling. This may require establishing the full range and variability of TCN inventories across different landscape domains, on landforms in those domains, and for different nuclides across and at depth within multiple rock and boulder surfaces (Skov et al, 2020, Knudsen et al, 2020, Nørgaard et al, 2023, Andersen et al, 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further research is needed in this and similar landscapes to separate (i) exposure and burial from (ii) bedrock erosion histories and (iii) the effects of boulder transportation, disturbance, burial and recycling. This may require establishing the full range and variability of TCN inventories across different landscape domains, on landforms in those domains, and for different nuclides across and at depth within multiple rock and boulder surfaces (Skov et al, 2020, Knudsen et al, 2020, Nørgaard et al, 2023, Andersen et al, 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the largest extent of the north Alpine glaciers (Most Extensive Glaciation of the Swiss Foreland cf. Schlüchter, 1988) was assigned to the Möhlin glaciation (Preusser et al, 2011) and recently dated to 500±100 ka and thus to MIS 12 through burial dating with cosmogenic 26 Al and 10 Be (Dieleman et al, 2022), a re-evaluation of the reported concentrations of the cosmogenic nuclides yielded an age that is more consistent with MIS 6 (Nørgaard et al, 2023). The Quaternary fill of overdeepenings can now be placed into the aforementioned chronological framework of glacial advances onto the Swiss plateau during the past glaciations (Figure 8).…”
Section: Chronological Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further removed from these correlative landform ages is the timing of surface-breaking faulting. For example, available evidence implies deposition of the ancient basin-filling Nenana Gravel between 4.5 and 1 Ma (Athey et al, 2006;Nørgaard et al, 2023), effectively leaving a 4.5 million yearlong time interval during which faulting of the unit may have occurred. Hence, the rates resulting from the correlations of Bemis (2010) contain prominent but unquantifiable epistemic uncertainty in that it is unclear what relationship the assigned ages bear to either landform formation or hypothesized abandonment via faulting.…”
Section: Landform Age Uncertaintiesmentioning
confidence: 99%