“…Although the chemistry of K–R adducts was characterized about half a century ago by chemists Kukhtin and Ramirez, utilization of this intermediate as a C1 carbene surrogate or free carbene remained almost untouched until the past decade. − In this context, Radosevich, Ashfeld, and He research groups have contributed adequately to a stage where organic chemists can think forward as a scope to explore this field to a greater height . To date, the K–R intermediates illustrated many transformations intermolecularly, such as carbene equivalent formal C–H insertion, alkylation, 1,2-annulation, 1,4-annulation, and others, where these can act as electrophiles or nucleophiles depending on the counterpart present in the reaction medium. , Moreover, the P(III)/P(V) redox cycling reaction of α-keto esters and carboxylic acids by Radosevich and co-workers has added an additional thrill to this reactivity in the era of catalysis . However, the intramolecular variant was scarce until the very recent publications from the He group, where solvent and substituent-dependent product diversity on P(NMe 2 ) 3 mediated intramolecular annulation of o -benzoyl formate tethered trisubstituted electron-deficient alkenes has been documented. , These are the only prior reports on intramolecular K–R adduct-triggered cascade Michael addition cyclopropanation or 2,2-disubstituted chromenes synthesis.…”