1978
DOI: 10.1049/el:19780555
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

P.I.D. equivalent of optimal regulator

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
1
20
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The model has one fast pole (236.3 rad/s), attributed to the immediate conservation of momentum effect of moving the arms, and one slower pole (16.77 rad/s), which is approximately equal to the nominal gait frequency, and thus attributed to the gait and stepping dynamics. Similar to the approach in [16], the PD feedback law is given by…”
Section: Tuning Of the Feedback Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The model has one fast pole (236.3 rad/s), attributed to the immediate conservation of momentum effect of moving the arms, and one slower pole (16.77 rad/s), which is approximately equal to the nominal gait frequency, and thus attributed to the gait and stepping dynamics. Similar to the approach in [16], the PD feedback law is given by…”
Section: Tuning Of the Feedback Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So know we have two combinations of circuits one is PI-D and I-PD. As suggested in [11], [12] the types are type B and type C respectively.…”
Section: A Types Of Pid Controllersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The present work uses the model structure exposed in [6,12,15] as a starting point but, as a novel contribution, introduces a nonlinear time-varying mathematic model of the rotors used in the DJI F-450 quadrotor (Figure 1), that is used to perform a more detailed and realistic analysis of the control system through numerical simulations. Several methods have been published to control the fly of SUAV [1,2,5,[9][10][11]13,14,[28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35]. In the present work, we propose a control law structure based on a combination of PID and LQR/LQG algorithms but, in contrast to those exposed in others works [5,[30][31][32][33][34][35], a modified LQR/LQG controller is used to obtain the optimal pre-tuning parameters of four PID controllers, commonly employed for attitude and altitude control in multirotor systems (hover maneuver).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several methods have been published to control the fly of SUAV [1,2,5,[9][10][11]13,14,[28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35]. In the present work, we propose a control law structure based on a combination of PID and LQR/LQG algorithms but, in contrast to those exposed in others works [5,[30][31][32][33][34][35], a modified LQR/LQG controller is used to obtain the optimal pre-tuning parameters of four PID controllers, commonly employed for attitude and altitude control in multirotor systems (hover maneuver). Additionally, the uncertainty affecting the measurements are taken into account through the errors and noise modeling of a LIDAR, an optical flow camera, and a MEMS type MARG (Magnetic, Angular Rate, Gravity) sensor.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%