2009
DOI: 10.2422/2036-2145.2005.2.06
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

p-Harmonic measure is not additive on null sets

Abstract: When 1 < p < ∞ and p = 2 the p-harmonic measure on the boundary of the half plane R 2

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At the same time, although not directly applicable here, the main result (Theorem 1.1) in Llorente-Manfredi-Wu [46] indicates that in general Q W is not likely to be a vector lattice. Their result shows that for the upper half plane (which is unbounded and thus not included here) whenever 1 < p < ∞ and p = 2, there are finitely many sets E 1 , E 2 , ... , E n such that R = n j=1 E j while P χ Ej ≡ 0 for all j and P χ R ≡ 1.…”
Section: It Will Be Convenient To Define Lmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…At the same time, although not directly applicable here, the main result (Theorem 1.1) in Llorente-Manfredi-Wu [46] indicates that in general Q W is not likely to be a vector lattice. Their result shows that for the upper half plane (which is unbounded and thus not included here) whenever 1 < p < ∞ and p = 2, there are finitely many sets E 1 , E 2 , ... , E n such that R = n j=1 E j while P χ Ej ≡ 0 for all j and P χ R ≡ 1.…”
Section: It Will Be Convenient To Define Lmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…When studying boundary behavior of p-harmonic type functions, various versions of generalizations of harmonic measures have been introduced and studied for p = 2, see e.g. Llorente-Manfredi-Wu [49]. In the case of constant p (p = 2) Bennewitz and Lewis employed the doubling property of a p-harmonic measure, first proved in Eremenko-Lewis [26], to obtain a Boundary Harnack inequality for p-harmonic functions in the plane, see Bennewitz-Lewis [17].…”
Section: P(•)-harmonic Measurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…When F is the characteristic function 1 A for some A ⊂ ∂Ω, the value H F (x) is called the p-harmonic measure of A at x and written ω p (A, x, Ω). It is well known (see, e.g., [6]) that if ω p (A, x 0 , Ω) = 0 for some x 0 in a connected domain Ω, then ω p (A, x, Ω) = 0 for all points x ∈ Ω. Theorem 4.2 is interesting in light of the fact that p-harmonic measure is non-additive even on null sets [11]. In fact, [11] exhibits a disjoint finite collection {A i } of resolutive sets with p-harmonic measure zero whose union is all of ∂Ω.…”
Section: Shrinking Step Sizesmentioning
confidence: 99%