2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2019.07.093
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

p-Coumaric acid inhibits the Listeria monocytogenes RecA protein functions and SOS response: An antimicrobial target

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Few inhibitors of DNA repair have been verified so far. For example, p -coumaric acid was found to interfere with the DNA-binding ability of RecA in Listeria monocytogenes and increased the activity of ciprofloxacin against this pathogen . Another study found that zinc inhibits the ability of RecA to bind to single-stranded DNA, suggesting a potential application for zinc ionophores .…”
Section: Part 2: Antibiotic Combinationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Few inhibitors of DNA repair have been verified so far. For example, p -coumaric acid was found to interfere with the DNA-binding ability of RecA in Listeria monocytogenes and increased the activity of ciprofloxacin against this pathogen . Another study found that zinc inhibits the ability of RecA to bind to single-stranded DNA, suggesting a potential application for zinc ionophores .…”
Section: Part 2: Antibiotic Combinationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, p-coumaric acid was found to interfere with the DNA-binding ability of RecA in Listeria monocytogenes and increased the activity of ciprofloxacin against this pathogen. 213 Another study found that zinc inhibits the ability of RecA to bind to single-stranded DNA, suggesting a potential application for zinc ionophores. 214 However, the effectivity and cytotoxicity of zinc ionophores would depend on the external zinc concentration, 215 which may limit this approach to topical applications or targeted drug delivery and release approaches.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The decreasing rank based on the summed total content of the determined phenolic compounds was PEA (244·0 ± 11·6 mg 100 g −1 )>PEM (157·3 ± 18·8 mg g −1 )>PEC (93·0 ± 0·7 mg 100 g −1 ). Previous studies have reported antibacterial effects of catechin (Sinsinwar and Vadivel 2020), p ‐coumaric acid (Bag and Chattopadhyay 2017; Ojha and Patil 2019) and procyanidin B 2 (Alejo‐Armijo et al . 2017) on some pathogenic bacteria.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It can be approached from the following five aspects: (1) Block bacterial SOS response pathway; (2) Interrupt SOS-to-prophage activation signal; (3) Reduce bacterial inflammatory properties or relieve intestinal inflammation with external intervention; (4) Vaccination against gut disease; (5) Avoid the abuse of antibiotics ( Figure 2C ). In recent years, the short first in class α-helical peptide, phenolic compound N-acetylcysteine, 5-amino-1-(carbamoylmethyl)-1H-1, 2, 3-triazole-4-carboxamide scaffold, zinc, phthalocyanine tetrasulfonic acid, fermentates from probiotic strains, and p-Coumaric acid were found to inhibit RecA protein activities, thereby blocking the SOS system ( Alam et al, 2016 ; Bunnell et al, 2017 ; Yakimov et al, 2017 ; Selwood et al, 2018 ; Ojha and Patil, 2019 ; Prazdnova et al, 2019 ; Rodríguez-Rosado et al, 2019 ). RecA protein inhibitor bind to the L2 loop through the ssDNA site on the epithelium ( Bellio et al, 2017 ).…”
Section: Effects Of Prophage Activation On Physiological Characteristics Of Bacteria and Intestinal Healthmentioning
confidence: 99%