Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2009
DOI: 10.3103/s1068373909030078
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ozone content over the Russian Federation in 2008

Abstract: A review is compiled based on the results of the system of monitoring total ozone (TO) over the CIS and Baltic countries that is operated in real time at the Central Aerological Observatory (CAO). The TO monitoring system uses the data from the national M-124 filter ozonometer network operated under the methodological guidance of the Main Geophysical Observatory. The performance of the system as a whole is operationally verified against the OMI satellite (US NASA) observations. The main TO observational data a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The difference between annual mean TO values of these two stations amounted in 2010 to 32 DU. The observation data at network stations of Lvov, Odessa, Ashkhabad, Chardzhou, the Aral Sea, Nikolaevsk-on-Amur, Voronezh, Moscow, Feodosiya, Guryev, and Vladivostok were not used for the analysis of the ozone fields because of their poor quality.The norms for different months of the fourth quarter, multiyear mean TO values over the Russian Federation and adjacent territories for 1974-1984, were given in [2]. Quarterly mean TO values in the fourth quarter of 2010 over the entire territory under control were close to multiyear means for 1974-1984 (Fig.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The difference between annual mean TO values of these two stations amounted in 2010 to 32 DU. The observation data at network stations of Lvov, Odessa, Ashkhabad, Chardzhou, the Aral Sea, Nikolaevsk-on-Amur, Voronezh, Moscow, Feodosiya, Guryev, and Vladivostok were not used for the analysis of the ozone fields because of their poor quality.The norms for different months of the fourth quarter, multiyear mean TO values over the Russian Federation and adjacent territories for 1974-1984, were given in [2]. Quarterly mean TO values in the fourth quarter of 2010 over the entire territory under control were close to multiyear means for 1974-1984 (Fig.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The norms for different months of the fourth quarter, multiyear mean TO values over the Russian Federation and adjacent territories for 1974-1984, were given in [2]. Quarterly mean TO values in the fourth quarter of 2010 over the entire territory under control were close to multiyear means for 1974-1984 (Fig.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The basic results of total ozone (TO) observations for the first three quarters of 2020 were described before in [10][11][12]. The normals (multiyear means) of TO over Russia and adjoining areas computed for different months of the fourth quarter for the period of 1974-1984 were presented in [4]. The deviations from the normal are given in percent and standard deviation units; the anomalous deviation is the deviation from the normal by ³2.5 SD.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%