2010
DOI: 10.1123/pes.22.3.431
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Oxygen Uptake Efficiency Slope in Healthy Children

Abstract: The objective of this study was to investigate the characteristics of the submaximal Oxygen Uptake Efficiency Slope (OUES) in a healthy pediatric population. Bicycle ergometry exercise tests with gas-analyses were performed in 46 healthy children aged 7-17 years. Maximal OUES, submaximal OUES, VO(2)peak, V(E)peak, and ventilatory threshold (VT) were determined. The submaximal OUES correlated highly with VO(2)peak, V(E)peak, and VT. Strong correlations were found with basic anthropometric variables. The submaxi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
59
4

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
5
59
4
Order By: Relevance
“…A recent study involving boys and girls 7-17 found no differences between boys and girls in absolute values of VO 2peak , V Epeak , and OUES, but when adjusted for body mass, FFM, and BSA that VO 2peak and V Epeak were higher in boys with still no difference in OUES (1). In light of these findings, it was recommend that given the influence of size parameters on OUES, especially in the pediatric population, it is appropriate to express OUES relative to anthropometric measurements, with FFM as the best means to correct for the influence of size.…”
Section: Oues In Children and Adolescentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A recent study involving boys and girls 7-17 found no differences between boys and girls in absolute values of VO 2peak , V Epeak , and OUES, but when adjusted for body mass, FFM, and BSA that VO 2peak and V Epeak were higher in boys with still no difference in OUES (1). In light of these findings, it was recommend that given the influence of size parameters on OUES, especially in the pediatric population, it is appropriate to express OUES relative to anthropometric measurements, with FFM as the best means to correct for the influence of size.…”
Section: Oues In Children and Adolescentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Perhaps due to some of the challenges applying in exercise testing procedures in children and youth (64), several studies have examined OUES in this population (1,17,18,32,51,53). The first study to introduce the concept of the OUES utilized a pediatric population (11.7 ± 4.4 years) and compared healthy controls to children with congenital heart disease with the idea of developing an objective, maximal effort independent measurement of cardiorespiratory function in a population that would have difficulty achieving maximal test criteria (17).…”
Section: Oues In Children and Adolescentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The test was completed when (a) respiratory exchange ratio (RER) gain was >1.1 according to changes of VCO 2 /VO 2 on screen, (b) the HR of >185, and (c) the announcement of exhaustive case. [22,23] In this protocol, for the first four stages of ergometry, 15 s and in the next stages 5-7 min were taken and the whole protocol lasted 10 min. [21,24] To determine VO 2 max in the direct method of analyzer gas, the mean of every 10 s of measuring VO 2 and VCO 2 was recorded and physiological information in final 20 s of ergometry was used to determine the practical capacity.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…And this was the only available study which investigated the effect of maturity on OUES of children. 10 Also Akkerman et al 16 in 2010 on healthy children of 7---17 years old showed a high correlation of R = 0.95 in both indices OUES and VO 2max . But significant difference in the OUES index when performing two patterns of standard exhaustive and submaximal physical labor was not found and this was found that OUES is affected by anthropometric variables and thus it was suggested that OUES must be corrected by the intervention factors of BSA or FFM.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%