2015
DOI: 10.1542/neo.16-7-e393
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Oxygen Saturation in the Newborn and the Importance of Avoiding Hyperoxia-Induced Damage

Abstract: Dr Sola has disclosed he works part-time for Masimo Corp. as vice president, medical affairs, neonatology. This commentary does contain a discussion of an unapproved/ investigative use of a commercial product/ device. Educational GapThere is a need for education about judicious use of oxygen supplementation and potential damaging effects of hyperoxemia. AbstractWhen a newborn has suspected or confirmed hypoxemia, clinical measures for evaluation and treatment are started without delay, which is appropriate. Ox… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
0
6

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
1
20
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…However, for preterm infants requiring supplemental oxygen, the optimum range of SpO 2 to minimize organ damage, without causing hypoxic injury, remains controversial [9, 10]. Between 2005 and 2007, five randomized trials, known collectively as the Neonatal Oxygen Prospective Meta-analysis (NeOProM) collaboration, were designed to compare the effects of a lower SpO 2 target range (85 to 89%) vs. a higher target range (91 to 95%) in preterm infants (<28 weeks) [1, 11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, for preterm infants requiring supplemental oxygen, the optimum range of SpO 2 to minimize organ damage, without causing hypoxic injury, remains controversial [9, 10]. Between 2005 and 2007, five randomized trials, known collectively as the Neonatal Oxygen Prospective Meta-analysis (NeOProM) collaboration, were designed to compare the effects of a lower SpO 2 target range (85 to 89%) vs. a higher target range (91 to 95%) in preterm infants (<28 weeks) [1, 11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, we can only speculate on this point because we did not perform repeated measurements with any of the two devices in order to estimate the inherent bias in our setting. Nevertheless, it should be noted that current industry data report neonatal-based pulse oximetry algorithms to have a precision (SD of the bias) that can be as low as 2% on some monitors but as high as 5% on others [18]. Interestingly, the SD of the bias that we observed between the Radical-7 and the iSpO 2 -Rx was less than 2%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…Moreover, the iSpO 2 -Rx provided reliable measurements of saturations below 95% in a group of NICU patients. We did not observe any systematic bias and the differences between the two pulse oximeters can be attributed to the inherent bias that all saturation monitors have when they function according to their specifications [18]. Unfortunately, we can only speculate on this point because we did not perform repeated measurements with any of the two devices in order to estimate the inherent bias in our setting.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…El O es un elemento necesario para la vida, su uso 2 muchas veces termina siendo iatrogénico ya que (18) muchos de los RN son expuestos a la hiperoxia , cual es la saturación de oxígeno (SpO ) óptima para 2 el tratamiento de RN, ésta aún no ha podido ser determinada. Sin embargo, numerosos y estudios clínicos randomizados, meta-análisis y comentarios publicados recientemente han añadido información (19) valiosa y han permitido el discernimiento , sobretodo de lo que debería evitarse durante la oxigenoterapia.…”
Section: El Oxigeno Y El Estres Oxidativo Medición De La Oxigenaciónunclassified