1980
DOI: 10.1016/0009-2509(80)85101-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Oxygen mass transfer in bubble columns

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

1981
1981
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They concluded that different mass transfer mechanisms exist in both the distributor and bulk zones. Some lateral variation in the C L values at a given axial position (z) was also observed by Alvarez-Cuenca et al (1980). The variation was more pronounced in the lower zone (LZ) and at lower u g .…”
Section: Randd Notementioning
confidence: 69%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…They concluded that different mass transfer mechanisms exist in both the distributor and bulk zones. Some lateral variation in the C L values at a given axial position (z) was also observed by Alvarez-Cuenca et al (1980). The variation was more pronounced in the lower zone (LZ) and at lower u g .…”
Section: Randd Notementioning
confidence: 69%
“…Sometimes larger k L a values are observed in the distributor zone (Houghton et al, 1957;Deckwer et al, 1974Deckwer et al, , 1978Deckwer et al, , 1980 Buchholz et al, 1980;Herbrechtsmeier et al, 1981). Alvarez-Cuenca et al (1980) observed two distinct absorption zones (distributor and bulk zones) during mass transfer of oxygen (O 2 ) between air and water. High k L a values were observed in the distributor zone which extended up to a maximum height of about 5-15 % of the BB volume (Deckwer et al, 1974(Deckwer et al, , 1978.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The solution of Equations (1) and (2) is: This average ( L a ) , which was obtained using Equations (3) and (4) in conjunction with the experimental concentration profiles, is presented in Figures 2, 4, 5 and 6 as a function of V , and y. The discussion of these results is postponed to the following section.…”
Section: The Modelmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Researches on measuring and calculating height of gas distributor region have been rare, leading to great difficulties in defining the region. AlvarezCuenca et al [22] reported that, for superficial gas velocity less than 0.28 m/s and superficial liquid velocity of 0.25 m/s, the gas distributor region is less than 20 cm in height. In gas-liquid system, it can be clearly observed that the lower boundary of the feed affected region is about 190 mm to the exit of the feed tube.…”
Section: Apparatusmentioning
confidence: 98%