The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
1986
DOI: 10.1016/0169-8095(86)90004-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Oxygen isotopic composition of Central Sierra Nevada precipitation, I. Identification of ice-phase water capture regions in winter storms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
9
0

Year Published

1987
1987
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
2
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Comparable δ18normalOprecip values (−12‰ to −24‰) were measured during a 1985 March storm in Kingvale, CA, which is located upwind of the Sierra Nevada crest at an elevation of 1859 m [ Warburton et al , ]. Warburton and DeFelice [] analyzed samples in the Central Sierra Nevada and found that snow formed through vapor deposition had a δ 18 O signature that ranged from −18.4‰ to −22.9‰, which corresponds well with our cold temperature profile experiments (see further discussion in section 3). The snow samples from the same study that indicated growth by a combination of riming and vapor deposition were less depleted and ranged between −6.4‰ and −16.8‰, which resembles results in our warm simulations (see section 3).…”
Section: Model and Experimentssupporting
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Comparable δ18normalOprecip values (−12‰ to −24‰) were measured during a 1985 March storm in Kingvale, CA, which is located upwind of the Sierra Nevada crest at an elevation of 1859 m [ Warburton et al , ]. Warburton and DeFelice [] analyzed samples in the Central Sierra Nevada and found that snow formed through vapor deposition had a δ 18 O signature that ranged from −18.4‰ to −22.9‰, which corresponds well with our cold temperature profile experiments (see further discussion in section 3). The snow samples from the same study that indicated growth by a combination of riming and vapor deposition were less depleted and ranged between −6.4‰ and −16.8‰, which resembles results in our warm simulations (see section 3).…”
Section: Model and Experimentssupporting
confidence: 80%
“…The snow samples from the same study that indicated growth by a combination of riming and vapor deposition were less depleted and ranged between −6.4‰ and −16.8‰, which resembles results in our warm simulations (see section 3). Values similar to Warburton and DeFelice [] were measured in Colorado by Lowenthal et al [] for snow that had undergone little riming. In the same study, snow that experienced more riming (as indicated by higher concentrations of sulfate) was less depleted and ranged between −15.6‰ and −20.4‰.…”
Section: Model and Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recent work has verified that distance from the sea is equally important as altitude, suggesting that progressive airmass transformation is occurring (Cortes and Farvolden 1989;Zwally et al 1998;Giovinetto et al 1997). Other studies have used isotopes to reveal dominant cloud physics processes (Warburton and DeFelice 1986;Smith 1992).…”
Section: Isotopic Estimates Of the Atmospheric Drying Ratiomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this process, unrimed snow crystals falling from mid-to upper-level "seeder" clouds must descend through the "feeder" cloud of supercooled droplets before reaching the surface. The region of the heaviest riming has been shown to occur in the lower levels within 1-2 km of the surface (Rauber et al 1986;Heggli and Rauber 1988;Warburton and DeFelice 1986). This low-level riming process enhances the precipitation efficiency, such that the amount of rime has been shown to comprise up to 20%-50% of the final snow mass that reaches the surface (Mitchell et al 1990;Borys et al 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%