2019
DOI: 10.1111/maps.13281
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Oxygen isotopic and chemical composition of chromites in micrometeorites: Evidence of ordinary chondrite precursors

Abstract: We identified 66 chromite grains from 42 of ~5000 micrometeorites collected from Indian Ocean deep‐sea sediments and the South Pole water well. To determine the chromite grains precursors and their contribution to the micrometeorite flux, we combined quantitative electron microprobe analyses and oxygen isotopic analyses by high‐resolution secondary ion mass spectrometry. Micrometeorite chromite grains show variable O isotopic compositions with δ18O values ranging from −0.8 to 6.0‰, δ17O values from 0.3 to 3.6‰… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
(149 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, Fe‐sulfides (troilite, pyrrhotite, and pentlandite) are also ruled out because they suffer thermal decomposition at low temperatures (<800°C; King et al., 2015; Taylor et al., 2011) under open system conditions and would, therefore, not survive unmelted in a cosmic spherule. By contrast, chromite has both a higher average atomic weight than magnetite and is a refractory mineral, likely to survive atmospheric entry without significant melting (Heck et al., 2016; Rudraswami et al., 2019). Although, resorption textures are present on at least two sides of the grain, they are limited in extent, indicating only incipient melting at the grain margins.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, Fe‐sulfides (troilite, pyrrhotite, and pentlandite) are also ruled out because they suffer thermal decomposition at low temperatures (<800°C; King et al., 2015; Taylor et al., 2011) under open system conditions and would, therefore, not survive unmelted in a cosmic spherule. By contrast, chromite has both a higher average atomic weight than magnetite and is a refractory mineral, likely to survive atmospheric entry without significant melting (Heck et al., 2016; Rudraswami et al., 2019). Although, resorption textures are present on at least two sides of the grain, they are limited in extent, indicating only incipient melting at the grain margins.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most cosmic spherules are in the size range of less than a few hundred μm; thus, the instrument can perform a detailed study of specific areas in particles. Chemical analyses were performed using electron microprobe on selected cosmic spherules phases with accelerating voltage ~15 kV, beam current ~12 nA, ~1–2 μm beam diameter for spot analyses, and ~5 μm beam diameter for bulk analyses (Rudraswami et al, 2019). Multiple measurements obtained using different standards are <1% error for major elements and within a few percent for minor elements.…”
Section: Instrumental Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The instrumental mass fractionation in olivine grains was corrected using San Carlos olivine, and for I‐type and some G‐type spherules that were dominated by magnetite we have used an internal terrestrial magnetite standard. Further, detailed technical description of the SEM, electron microprobe, and ion microprobe is given elsewhere (Rudraswami et al, 2019).…”
Section: Instrumental Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Particle density is a variable parameter, since the densities of interplanetary dust particles (IDPs) captured in the stratosphere, although peaked at ∼2 g cm −3 similar to CI chondrites, exhibit a spread up to 3.5 g cm −3 , i.e., similar to the densities of ordinary chondrites (Flynn & Sutton 1990;Love et al 1994;Flynn et al 2018;Rojas et al 2021). Previous studies on MMs have assumed that their precursors are essentially either CI or CM chondrites, though other chondrites need to be treated for completion (e.g., Brownlee et al 1997;Taylor et al 2000;Prasad et al 2013Prasad et al , 2015Rudraswami et al 2019). (Clayton et al 1986;Engrand et al 1999Engrand et al , 2005Taylor et al 2005;Suavet et al 2010;Cordier et al 2011;Rudraswami et al 2015Rudraswami et al , 2020Van Ginnekan et al 2017;Suttle et al 2020;Goderis et al 2020;Fischer et al 2021).…”
Section: The Chemical Ablation Model (Cabmod)mentioning
confidence: 99%