1996
DOI: 10.1016/0016-7037(96)00112-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Oxygen isotope fractionations in muscovite, phlogopite, and rutile

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
43
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 90 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
4
43
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Quartz and muscovite from VM show δ 18 O values of 10.9 and 9.3 ‰, respectively. Assuming equilibrium, this quartz-muscovite pair yields a formation temperature of 673°C (Chacko et al 1996), whereas the fluid in equilibrium with the minerals has a δ 18 O value of 10.5 ‰ (Matsuhisa et al 1979). This value most likely reflects magmatic origin (Sheppard 1986).…”
Section: Oxygen Isotopesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Quartz and muscovite from VM show δ 18 O values of 10.9 and 9.3 ‰, respectively. Assuming equilibrium, this quartz-muscovite pair yields a formation temperature of 673°C (Chacko et al 1996), whereas the fluid in equilibrium with the minerals has a δ 18 O value of 10.5 ‰ (Matsuhisa et al 1979). This value most likely reflects magmatic origin (Sheppard 1986).…”
Section: Oxygen Isotopesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study we calculate the fractionation of d 18 O on coeval pairs of quartz and white mica in three calcite-quartz-white mica rich veins (samples MC494, MC497 and MC498) using the following coefficients: A = −0.0086, B = 0.042, C = 0.000, D = 1.350, E = 0.00 and F = 0.00 [Chacko et al, 1996]. Further details of the method are given in Appendix D.…”
Section: Oxygen Isotope Thermometrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, fractionation factors from Zheng [1993aZheng [ , 1993b were replaced with those of Clayton and Keiffer [1991] (quartzalbite), Wenner and Taylor [1971] (quartz-chlorite), and Chacko et al [1996] (quartz-muscovite) and substituted into the Á quartz À i term of (A2). The predicted uncertainties, which arise from changing one of conditions 1 -3 while holding the other two constant, are presented in Table A3.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%